THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - VICTORIA - May 20, 2006 JUNIORS - CLASS A (30 Shoes) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER ALTA 0509 6 0 237 89 180 49.44% 2 SAM DEGRAAF BC 1467 3 3 94 44 180 24.44% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF BC 1468 0 6 36 15 180 8.33% > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER - ALTA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 46/1 14 30 46.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 37/3 14 30 46.66 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 31/4 9 30 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 46/8 19 30 63.33 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 47/3 18 30 60.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 30/13 15 30 50.00 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 6 L 0 89 180 49.44 2 SAM DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 23/5 10 30 33.33 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 3/37 4 30 13.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 28/8 9 30 30.00 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 8/46 6 30 20.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 18/15 7 30 23.33 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 13/30 8 30 26.66 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3 L 3 44 180 24.44 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 1/46 2 30 6.66 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 5/23 3 30 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 4/31 1 30 3.33 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 8/28 2 30 6.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER L 3/47 3 30 10.00 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 15/18 4 30 13.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 9%) TOTALS W 0 L 6 15 180 8.33 JUNIORS - CLASS B (30 Shoes) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RACHEL VINCENT BC 7779 8 1 137 17 270 6.29% 2 MATHEW MACDONALD BC 7775 6 3 181 47 270 17.40% 3* HANNA VINCENT BC 4138 2 7 76 12 270 4.44% 4* DANIELLE REMMING BC 0000 2 7 38 3 270 1.11% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RACHEL VINCENT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 HANNA VINCENT W 13/6 2 30 6.66 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 12/2 0 30 None 2 MATHEW MACDONALD W 15/7 3 30 10.00 3 HANNA VINCENT W 22/8 4 30 13.33 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 12/4 0 30 None 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 5/27 0 30 None 3 HANNA VINCENT W 18/11 2 30 6.66 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 25/3 5 30 16.66 2 MATHEW MACDONALD W 15/4 1 30 3.33 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 17 270 6.29 2 MATHEW MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 30/3 8 30 26.66 3 HANNA VINCENT W 26/9 6 30 20.00 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 7/15 3 30 10.00 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 42/2 12 30 40.00 3 HANNA VINCENT L 5/11 1 30 3.33 1 RACHEL VINCENT W 27/5 7 30 23.33 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 17/2 4 30 13.33 3 HANNA VINCENT W 23/6 6 30 20.00 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 4/15 0 30 None (Was 9%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 47 270 17.40 3* HANNA VINCENT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 6/13 1 30 3.33 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 9/26 3 30 10.00 4 DANIELLE REMMING L 5/6 0 30 None 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 8/22 1 30 3.33 2 MATHEW MACDONALD W 11/5 3 30 10.00 4 DANIELLE REMMING L 4/9 0 30 None 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 11/18 2 30 6.66 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 6/23 0 30 None 4 DANIELLE REMMING W 16/7 2 30 6.66 (Was 2%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 12 270 4.44 4* DANIELLE REMMING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 3/30 0 30 None 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 2/12 0 30 None 3 HANNA VINCENT W 6/5 1 30 3.33 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 2/42 0 30 None 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 4/12 0 30 None 3 HANNA VINCENT W 9/4 0 30 None 2 MATHEW MACDONALD L 2/17 0 30 None 1 RACHEL VINCENT L 3/25 1 30 3.33 3 HANNA VINCENT L 7/16 1 30 3.33 (Was 1%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 3 270 1.11 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 10 0 416 271 486 55.76% 2* MARYSE ATKINSON BC 0597 6 4 368 262 528 49.62% 3* BRENDA ARNOLD BC 3894 6 4 353 247 510 48.43% 4 JUNE THOMPSON BC 3884 4 6 336 233 526 44.29% 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF BC 0062 3 7 264 182 478 38.07% 6 CINDY HELGESON BC 3969 1 9 227 175 476 36.76% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 CINDY HELGESON W 43/26 19 40 47.50 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 44/19 27 54 50.00 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/23 24 44 54.54 3 BRENDA ARNOLD W 41/14 35 50 70.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON W 40/28 32 60 53.33 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/6 17 28 60.71 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/16 20 42 47.61 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 44/24 25 48 52.08 3 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/27 32 50 64.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON W 41/32 40 70 57.14 (Was 66%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 271 486 55.76 2* MARYSE ATKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 32/40 21 54 38.88 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 40/28 19 48 39.58 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/14 24 50 48.00 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 41/21 23 44 52.27 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 28/40 30 60 50.00 3 BRENDA ARNOLD W 41/29 25 50 50.00 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/28 34 56 60.71 6 CINDY HELGESON L 30/40 30 68 44.11 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 43/6 18 28 64.28 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 32/41 38 70 54.28 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 262 528 49.62 3* BRENDA ARNOLD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARYSE ATKINSON W 40/32 24 54 44.44 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/31 21 54 38.88 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/28 21 44 47.72 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 14/41 26 50 52.00 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 40/29 33 58 56.89 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 29/41 21 50 42.00 6 CINDY HELGESON W 45/5 22 36 61.11 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/23 26 56 46.42 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 27/42 27 50 54.00 4 JUNE THOMPSON L 38/42 26 58 44.82 (Was 56%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 247 510 48.43 4 JUNE THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 35/41 25 54 46.29 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 28/40 14 48 29.16 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 23/41 19 44 43.18 6 CINDY HELGESON W 45/33 27 60 45.00 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 29/40 28 58 48.27 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 42/30 26 58 44.82 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 28/41 29 56 51.78 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 24/44 19 48 39.58 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/19 20 42 47.61 3 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/38 26 58 44.82 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 233 526 44.29 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/35 26 54 48.14 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 19/44 20 54 37.03 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 28/40 19 44 43.18 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 21/41 15 44 34.09 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/25 21 48 43.75 4 JUNE THOMPSON L 30/42 23 58 39.65 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 16/40 12 42 28.57 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 23/40 21 56 37.50 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 6/43 5 28 17.85 6 CINDY HELGESON W 40/28 20 50 40.00 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 182 478 38.07 6 CINDY HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 26/43 15 40 37.50 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 31/40 19 54 35.18 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 14/40 15 50 30.00 4 JUNE THOMPSON L 33/45 26 60 43.33 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 25/40 18 48 37.50 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 6/40 7 28 25.00 3 BRENDA ARNOLD L 5/45 10 36 27.77 2 MARYSE ATKINSON W 40/30 33 68 48.52 4 JUNE THOMPSON L 19/40 14 42 33.33 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 28/40 18 50 36.00 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 175 476 36.76 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER BC 3902 9 1 402 180 406 44.33% 2 KATHY JUTEAU BC 0598 7 3 339 171 432 39.58% 3* MELANIE TAYLOR BC 1025 5 5 310 177 438 40.41% 4* NORENE BATTIE BC 2884 5 5 322 163 464 35.12% 5 RUBY MILLER BC 4853 4 6 329 171 466 36.69% 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK BC 3376 0 10 143 67 382 17.53% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 NORENE BATTIE W 40/17 17 42 40.47 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 40/8 13 28 46.42 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 41/22 22 42 52.38 2 KATHY JUTEAU W 43/21 20 40 50.00 5 RUBY MILLER W 40/20 16 36 44.44 4 NORENE BATTIE W 40/18 20 42 47.61 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 43/13 13 36 36.11 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 28/40 17 56 30.35 2 KATHY JUTEAU W 42/6 17 28 60.71 5 RUBY MILLER W 45/31 25 56 44.64 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 180 406 44.33 2 KATHY JUTEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 RUBY MILLER W 42/31 23 50 46.00 4 NORENE BATTIE W 43/11 17 50 34.00 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 41/23 18 54 33.33 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 21/43 14 40 35.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 42/32 25 48 52.08 5 RUBY MILLER L 19/42 14 48 29.16 4 NORENE BATTIE W 43/34 22 56 39.28 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 42/5 15 28 53.57 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 6/42 7 28 25.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 40/10 16 30 53.33 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 171 432 39.58 3* MELANIE TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 43/6 18 30 60.00 5 RUBY MILLER W 41/35 25 54 46.29 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 22/41 18 42 42.85 4 NORENE BATTIE L 8/41 6 26 23.07 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 32/42 21 48 43.75 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 42/26 20 44 45.45 5 RUBY MILLER L 30/41 22 52 42.30 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 40/28 21 56 37.50 4 NORENE BATTIE W 42/34 21 56 37.50 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 10/40 5 30 16.66 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 177 438 40.41 4* NORENE BATTIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 17/40 12 42 28.57 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 11/43 7 50 14.00 5 RUBY MILLER W 41/39 17 50 34.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 41/8 17 26 65.38 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 41/20 14 48 29.16 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 18/40 15 42 35.71 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 34/43 20 56 35.71 5 RUBY MILLER W 45/7 28 50 56.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 34/42 19 56 33.92 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 40/21 14 44 31.81 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 163 464 35.12 5 RUBY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 31/42 16 50 32.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 35/41 20 54 37.03 4 NORENE BATTIE L 39/41 16 50 32.00 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 40/4 13 28 46.42 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 20/40 10 36 27.77 2 KATHY JUTEAU W 42/19 19 48 39.58 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 41/30 24 52 46.15 4 NORENE BATTIE L 7/45 17 50 34.00 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 43/17 13 42 30.95 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 31/45 23 56 41.07 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 171 466 36.69 6 BETTY BLACKLOCK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 6/43 6 30 20.00 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 8/40 3 28 10.71 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 23/41 10 54 18.51 5 RUBY MILLER L 4/40 4 28 14.28 4 NORENE BATTIE L 20/41 7 48 14.58 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 26/42 14 44 31.81 1 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 13/43 6 36 16.66 2 KATHY JUTEAU L 5/42 3 28 10.71 5 RUBY MILLER L 17/43 6 42 14.28 4 NORENE BATTIE L 21/40 8 44 18.18 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 67 382 17.53 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA BC 4069 10 0 369 165 394 41.87% 2 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 7 3 309 154 390 39.48% 3 JEAN SNIDER BC 1252 5 5 278 136 396 34.34% 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE BC 0155 4 6 281 170 468 36.32% 5* VIOLET GALLANT BC 1023 2 8 234 119 448 26.56% 6* LORRAINE HUBICK BC 0881 2 8 221 116 440 26.36% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 36/19 17 40 42.50 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 38/17 15 32 46.87 3 JEAN SNIDER W 36/32 19 48 39.58 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 38/13 15 40 37.50 2 SUE BERTRAND W 40/15 18 36 50.00 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 35/20 18 40 45.00 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 35/30 15 52 28.84 3 JEAN SNIDER W 37/19 16 38 42.10 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 36/9 16 32 50.00 2 SUE BERTRAND W 38/16 16 36 44.44 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 165 394 41.87 2 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JEAN SNIDER W 37/5 16 24 66.66 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 36/28 24 58 41.37 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 36/21 15 44 34.09 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 35/19 13 36 36.11 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 15/40 11 36 30.55 3 JEAN SNIDER L 27/35 16 46 34.78 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 37/28 20 54 37.03 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/11 15 30 50.00 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 35/9 14 26 53.84 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 16/38 10 36 27.77 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 154 390 39.48 3 JEAN SNIDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SUE BERTRAND L 5/37 5 24 20.83 6 LORRAINE HUBICK L 21/36 13 54 24.07 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 32/36 17 48 35.41 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE L 19/36 8 34 23.52 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 36/20 16 40 40.00 2 SUE BERTRAND W 35/27 17 46 36.95 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 38/7 16 34 47.05 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 19/37 10 38 26.31 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 36/17 18 40 45.00 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 37/14 16 38 42.10 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 136 396 34.34 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 19/36 14 40 35.00 2 SUE BERTRAND L 28/36 21 58 36.20 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 36/21 20 56 35.71 3 JEAN SNIDER W 36/19 14 34 41.17 6 LORRAINE HUBICK L 24/37 16 44 36.36 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 20/35 15 40 37.50 2 SUE BERTRAND L 28/37 17 54 31.48 5 VIOLET GALLANT W 37/34 21 54 38.88 3 JEAN SNIDER L 17/36 12 40 30.00 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 36/29 20 48 41.66 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 170 468 36.32 5* VIOLET GALLANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/31 13 68 19.11 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 17/38 9 32 28.12 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE L 21/36 17 56 30.35 2 SUE BERTRAND L 19/35 8 36 22.22 3 JEAN SNIDER L 20/36 12 40 30.00 6 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/27 12 46 26.08 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 30/35 15 52 28.84 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE L 34/37 18 54 33.33 2 SUE BERTRAND L 9/35 5 26 19.23 3 JEAN SNIDER L 14/37 10 38 26.31 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 119 448 26.56 6* LORRAINE HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 VIOLET GALLANT L 31/35 11 68 16.17 3 JEAN SNIDER W 36/21 17 54 31.48 2 SUE BERTRAND L 21/36 11 44 25.00 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 13/38 6 40 15.00 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE W 37/24 20 44 45.45 5 VIOLET GALLANT L 27/35 10 46 21.73 3 JEAN SNIDER L 7/38 8 34 23.52 2 SUE BERTRAND L 11/35 7 30 23.33 1 YUMIKO YOKOTA L 9/36 9 32 28.12 4 CAROL ALDRIDGE L 29/36 17 48 35.41 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 116 440 26.36 WOMEN - CLASS D (35 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ROSE JOHNSON WA 0300 7 4 325 151 452 33.40% 2 SUSAN MACDONALD BC 4084 6 5 360 138 526 26.23% 3 MARG NORBURY BC 0609 5 5 249 110 434 25.34% 4 MARGE MACINTOSH BC 3900 5 5 298 108 454 23.78% 5 BETTY CLARKE BC 1093 5 5 264 101 444 22.74% 6 VERNA PARSLOW BC 3905 3 7 250 98 446 21.97% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ROSE JOHNSON - WA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BETTY CLARKE L 9/35 5 36 13.88 3 MARG NORBURY W 36/17 17 48 35.41 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 33/35 18 56 32.14 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 36/22 14 46 30.43 4 MARGE MACINTOSH L 21/35 10 36 27.77 5 BETTY CLARKE W 35/7 16 26 61.53 3 MARG NORBURY W 35/10 14 28 50.00 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 16/38 14 46 30.43 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 38/30 17 58 29.31 4 MARGE MACINTOSH W 36/8 14 28 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MARG NORBURY 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 30/26 12 44 27.27 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 151 452 33.40 2 SUSAN MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MARG NORBURY W 38/21 10 54 18.51 4 MARGE MACINTOSH L 30/40 16 52 30.76 1 ROSE JOHNSON W 35/33 16 56 28.57 5 BETTY CLARKE L 31/37 12 50 24.00 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 37/9 12 28 42.85 3 MARG NORBURY L 33/40 13 60 21.66 4 MARGE MACINTOSH W 35/25 11 44 25.00 1 ROSE JOHNSON W 38/16 19 46 41.30 5 BETTY CLARKE W 37/19 11 44 25.00 6 VERNA PARSLOW L 20/35 9 48 18.75 3 MARG NORBURY - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 26/30 9 44 20.45 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 6 L 5 138 526 26.23 3 MARG NORBURY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 21/38 9 54 16.66 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 17/36 12 48 25.00 6 VERNA PARSLOW L 8/38 5 36 13.88 4 MARGE MACINTOSH L 9/35 6 30 20.00 5 BETTY CLARKE W 35/27 15 50 30.00 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 40/33 16 60 26.66 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 10/35 7 28 25.00 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 37/15 14 42 33.33 4 MARGE MACINTOSH W 36/27 15 52 28.84 5 BETTY CLARKE W 36/13 11 34 32.35 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 110 434 25.34 4 MARGE MACINTOSH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 36/27 12 52 23.07 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 40/30 18 52 34.61 5 BETTY CLARKE L 34/38 18 64 28.12 3 MARG NORBURY W 35/9 11 30 36.66 1 ROSE JOHNSON W 35/21 11 36 30.55 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 36/12 9 46 19.56 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 25/35 8 44 18.18 5 BETTY CLARKE L 22/33 9 50 18.00 3 MARG NORBURY L 27/36 9 52 17.30 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 3/36 3 28 10.71 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 108 454 23.78 5 BETTY CLARKE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ROSE JOHNSON W 35/9 8 36 22.22 6 VERNA PARSLOW W 35/27 15 52 28.84 4 MARGE MACINTOSH W 38/34 19 64 29.68 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 37/31 13 50 26.00 3 MARG NORBURY L 27/35 8 50 16.00 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 7/35 7 26 26.92 6 VERNA PARSLOW L 16/35 8 38 21.05 4 MARGE MACINTOSH W 37/22 15 50 30.00 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 19/37 5 44 11.36 3 MARG NORBURY L 13/36 3 34 8.82 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 101 444 22.74 6 VERNA PARSLOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MARGE MACINTOSH L 27/36 12 52 23.07 5 BETTY CLARKE L 27/35 14 52 26.92 3 MARG NORBURY W 38/8 11 36 30.55 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 22/36 6 46 13.04 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 9/37 4 28 14.28 4 MARGE MACINTOSH L 12/36 4 46 8.69 5 BETTY CLARKE W 35/16 14 38 36.84 3 MARG NORBURY L 15/37 6 42 14.28 1 ROSE JOHNSON L 30/38 14 58 24.13 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/20 13 48 27.08 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 98 446 21.97 WOMEN - CLASS E (30 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BREANNA SNOW BC 4100 10 0 316 122 354 34.46% 2 SHARON DALY BC 4076 8 2 284 97 412 23.54% 3 CHERYL CLICHE BC 1016 5 5 243 89 426 20.89% 4 BARB WILLIAMSON BC 4075 4 6 237 87 408 21.32% 5 MARLENE HARGREAVES BC 1065 3 7 215 66 404 16.33% 6 LINDA GREVELING BC 0990 0 10 151 57 428 13.31% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BREANNA SNOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 32/3 11 24 45.83 3 CHERYL CLICHE W 32/23 13 40 32.50 6 LINDA GREVELING W 32/6 13 34 38.23 2 SHARON DALY W 34/24 16 46 34.78 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 32/18 10 38 26.31 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 30/11 16 36 44.44 3 CHERYL CLICHE W 32/11 11 30 36.66 6 LINDA GREVELING W 30/12 7 34 20.58 2 SHARON DALY W 30/8 9 28 32.14 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 32/21 16 44 36.36 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 122 354 34.46 2 SHARON DALY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CHERYL CLICHE W 32/24 11 42 26.19 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 30/18 11 42 26.19 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 35/26 14 38 36.84 1 BREANNA SNOW L 24/34 11 46 23.91 6 LINDA GREVELING W 32/15 8 38 21.05 3 CHERYL CLICHE W 32/18 10 44 22.72 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 30/27 13 48 27.08 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 30/10 8 38 21.05 1 BREANNA SNOW L 8/30 3 28 10.71 6 LINDA GREVELING W 31/17 8 48 16.66 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 97 412 23.54 3 CHERYL CLICHE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SHARON DALY L 24/32 12 42 28.57 1 BREANNA SNOW L 23/32 12 40 30.00 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 32/20 12 50 24.00 6 LINDA GREVELING W 30/19 9 54 16.66 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 32/23 10 32 31.25 2 SHARON DALY L 18/32 8 44 18.18 1 BREANNA SNOW L 11/32 5 30 16.66 4 BARB WILLIAMSON L 7/30 2 36 5.55 6 LINDA GREVELING W 31/23 9 52 17.30 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 35/28 10 46 21.73 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 89 426 20.89 4 BARB WILLIAMSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LINDA GREVELING W 30/7 8 28 28.57 2 SHARON DALY L 18/30 7 42 16.66 3 CHERYL CLICHE L 20/32 8 50 16.00 5 MARLE HARGREAVES L 10/31 2 34 5.88 1 BREANNA SNOW L 18/32 4 38 10.52 6 LINDA GREVELING W 32/9 9 36 25.00 2 SHARON DALY L 27/30 14 48 29.16 3 CHERYL CLICHE W 30/7 8 36 22.22 5 MARLE HARGREAVES W 31/22 14 52 26.92 1 BREANNA SNOW L 21/32 13 44 29.54 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 87 408 21.32 5 MARLENE HARGREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BREANNA SNOW L 3/32 1 24 4.16 6 LINDA GREVELING W 31/20 10 50 20.00 2 SHARON DALY L 26/35 8 38 21.05 4 BARB WILLIAMSON W 31/10 7 34 20.58 3 CHERYL CLICHE L 23/32 6 32 18.75 1 BREANNA SNOW L 11/30 7 36 19.44 6 LINDA GREVELING W 30/23 6 54 11.11 2 SHARON DALY L 10/30 6 38 15.78 4 BARB WILLIAMSON L 22/31 9 52 17.30 3 CHERYL CLICHE L 28/35 6 46 13.04 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 66 404 16.33 6 LINDA GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BARB WILLIAMSON L 7/30 3 28 10.71 5 MARLE HARGREAVES L 20/31 10 50 20.00 1 BREANNA SNOW L 6/32 7 34 20.58 3 CHERYL CLICHE L 19/30 5 54 9.25 2 SHARON DALY L 15/32 5 38 13.15 4 BARB WILLIAMSON L 9/32 2 36 5.55 5 MARLE HARGREAVES L 23/30 7 54 12.96 1 BREANNA SNOW L 12/30 4 34 11.76 3 CHERYL CLICHE L 23/31 6 52 11.53 2 SHARON DALY L 17/31 8 48 16.66 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 57 428 13.31 WOMEN - CLASS F (30 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ALICE HICKMAN BC 0173 7 1 225 60 282 21.27% 2 BELINDA LEBLANC BC 1055 5 3 168 44 262 16.79% 3* BETTY PETRIE BC 3885 3 5 174 55 330 16.66% 4* DOROTHY BYRNE BC 0163 3 5 174 52 358 14.52% 5 HELEN CHAPEL BC 3936 2 6 127 41 356 11.51% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ALICE HICKMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DOROTHY BYRNE W 31/8 6 32 18.75 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 32/6 9 30 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC W 30/6 9 34 26.47 3 BETTY PETRIE W 30/6 9 40 22.50 4 DOROTHY BYRNE W 30/16 8 32 25.00 5 HELEN CHAPEL L 11/30 4 38 10.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC W 30/2 7 24 29.16 3 BETTY PETRIE W 31/24 8 52 15.38 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 60 282 21.27 2 BELINDA LEBLANC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 30/5 7 36 19.44 3 BETTY PETRIE W 30/14 8 30 26.66 4 DOROTHY BYRNE L 6/30 1 28 3.57 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 6/30 3 34 8.82 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 32/11 6 36 16.66 3 BETTY PETRIE W 32/6 11 32 34.37 4 DOROTHY BYRNE W 30/20 8 42 19.04 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 2/30 0 24 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 14%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 44 262 16.79 3* BETTY PETRIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC L 14/30 4 30 13.33 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 32/8 11 36 30.55 4 DOROTHY BYRNE W 35/10 11 36 30.55 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 6/30 4 40 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC L 6/32 3 32 9.37 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 32/15 5 48 10.41 4 DOROTHY BYRNE L 25/31 9 56 16.07 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 24/31 8 52 15.38 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 55 330 16.66 4* DOROTHY BYRNE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 8/31 3 32 9.37 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC W 30/6 8 28 28.57 3 BETTY PETRIE L 10/35 2 36 5.55 5 HELEN CHAPEL W 32/22 10 64 15.62 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 16/30 7 32 21.87 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BELINDA LEBLANC L 20/30 5 42 11.90 3 BETTY PETRIE W 31/25 7 56 12.50 5 HELEN CHAPEL L 27/30 10 68 14.70 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 52 358 14.52 5 HELEN CHAPEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BELINDA LEBLANC L 5/30 2 36 5.55 1 ALICE HICKMAN L 6/32 2 30 6.66 3 BETTY PETRIE L 8/32 5 36 13.88 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 DOROTHY BYRNE L 22/32 7 64 10.93 2 BELINDA LEBLANC L 11/32 2 36 5.55 1 ALICE HICKMAN W 30/11 10 38 26.31 3 BETTY PETRIE L 15/32 3 48 6.25 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 DOROTHY BYRNE W 30/27 10 68 14.70 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 41 356 11.51 WOMEN - CLASS G (25Pts/40Sh) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# MARY FOURMEAUX BC 0607 7 3 188 47 374 12.56% 2 LOUISE MASON BC 4129 6 4 201 55 376 14.62% 3 LINDA TAYLOR BC 1292 5 4 195 53 328 16.15% 4 VERNA LLOYD BC 4128 1 8 147 23 354 6.49% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# MARY FOURMEAUX - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LOUISE MASON L 10/20 1 40 2.50 3 LINDA TAYLOR L 11/28 4 30 13.33 4 VERNA LLOYD W 23/21 6 40 15.00 2 LOUISE MASON W 25/18 8 40 20.00 3 LINDA TAYLOR W 25/13 8 32 25.00 4 VERNA LLOYD W 19/16 4 40 10.00 2 LOUISE MASON W 25/15 7 34 20.58 3 LINDA TAYLOR L 7/25 1 38 2.63 4 VERNA LLOYD W 23/12 3 40 7.50 2 LOUISE MASON W 20/10 5 40 12.50 (Was 8%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 47 374 12.56 2 LOUISE MASON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARY FOURMEAUX W 20/10 3 40 7.50 4 VERNA LLOYD W 21/18 6 40 15.00 3 LINDA TAYLOR L 19/23 7 40 17.50 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 18/25 6 40 15.00 4 VERNA LLOYD W 22/15 6 40 15.00 3 LINDA TAYLOR W 25/19 8 40 20.00 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 15/25 4 34 11.76 4 VERNA LLOYD W 25/11 6 34 17.64 3 LINDA TAYLOR W 26/22 6 28 21.42 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 10/20 3 40 7.50 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 55 376 14.62 3 LINDA TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 VERNA LLOYD L 15/16 3 40 7.50 1 MARY FOURMEAUX W 28/11 10 30 33.33 2 LOUISE MASON W 23/19 8 40 20.00 4 VERNA LLOYD W 25/14 5 40 12.50 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 13/25 4 32 12.50 2 LOUISE MASON L 19/25 6 40 15.00 4 VERNA LLOYD W 25/24 5 40 12.50 1 MARY FOURMEAUX W 25/7 6 38 15.78 2 LOUISE MASON L 22/26 6 28 21.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 13%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 53 328 16.15 4 VERNA LLOYD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LINDA TAYLOR W 16/15 5 40 12.50 2 LOUISE MASON L 18/21 5 40 12.50 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 21/23 3 40 7.50 3 LINDA TAYLOR L 14/25 2 40 5.00 2 LOUISE MASON L 15/22 0 40 None 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 16/19 1 40 2.50 3 LINDA TAYLOR L 24/25 6 40 15.00 2 LOUISE MASON L 11/25 1 34 2.94 1 MARY FOURMEAUX L 12/23 0 40 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 11%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 23 354 6.49 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TONY RONDOW BC 0600 8 2 396 270 470 57.44% 2 BUDDY DYRDA BC 3216 7 3 345 265 450 58.88% 3 JACK JOHNSON WA 0110 6 4 375 267 492 54.26% 4 MIKE THOMPSON BC 3636 4 6 248 157 430 36.51% 5 JERRY MELISSA BC 0534 3 7 285 236 500 47.20% 6 GORDON BUTTS BC 4202 2 8 228 183 438 41.78% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TONY RONDOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JACK JOHNSON W 41/37 43 74 58.10 5 JERRY MELISSA W 44/11 26 44 59.09 6 GORDON BUTTS W 43/13 26 42 61.90 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 41/21 27 50 54.00 2 BUDDY DYRDA W 41/3 18 22 81.81 3 JACK JOHNSON W 45/36 37 62 59.67 5 JERRY MELISSA L 27/41 21 52 40.38 6 GORDON BUTTS W 40/18 29 48 60.41 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 42/12 17 28 60.71 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 32/42 26 48 54.16 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 270 470 57.44 2 BUDDY DYRDA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 GORDON BUTTS W 40/3 24 32 75.00 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/9 26 40 65.00 5 JERRY MELISSA W 42/33 36 58 62.06 3 JACK JOHNSON L 39/41 39 66 59.09 1 TONY RONDOW L 3/41 6 22 27.27 6 GORDON BUTTS W 40/21 31 52 59.61 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 43/15 22 38 57.89 5 JERRY MELISSA W 41/19 37 58 63.79 3 JACK JOHNSON L 15/41 14 36 38.88 1 TONY RONDOW W 42/32 30 48 62.50 (Was 65%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 265 450 58.88 3 JACK JOHNSON - WA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TONY RONDOW L 37/41 42 74 56.75 6 GORDON BUTTS W 42/4 18 28 64.28 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/18 18 40 45.00 2 BUDDY DYRDA W 41/39 39 66 59.09 5 JERRY MELISSA L 24/41 27 52 51.92 1 TONY RONDOW L 36/45 34 62 54.83 6 GORDON BUTTS L 34/43 16 46 34.78 4 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/9 19 32 59.37 2 BUDDY DYRDA W 41/15 21 36 58.33 5 JERRY MELISSA W 40/29 33 56 58.92 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 267 492 54.26 4 MIKE THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JERRY MELISSA W 41/21 19 42 45.23 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 9/40 16 40 40.00 3 JACK JOHNSON L 18/40 12 40 30.00 1 TONY RONDOW L 21/41 18 50 36.00 6 GORDON BUTTS W 40/37 23 56 41.07 5 JERRY MELISSA W 41/28 21 54 38.88 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 15/43 11 38 28.94 3 JACK JOHNSON L 9/40 8 32 25.00 1 TONY RONDOW L 12/42 7 28 25.00 6 GORDON BUTTS W 42/33 22 50 44.00 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 157 430 36.51 5 JERRY MELISSA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MIKE THOMPSON L 21/41 14 42 33.33 1 TONY RONDOW L 11/44 15 44 34.09 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 33/42 32 58 55.17 6 GORDON BUTTS L 21/42 15 38 39.47 3 JACK JOHNSON W 41/24 32 52 61.53 4 MIKE THOMPSON L 28/41 18 54 33.33 1 TONY RONDOW W 41/27 27 52 51.92 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 19/41 30 58 51.72 6 GORDON BUTTS W 41/14 25 46 54.34 3 JACK JOHNSON L 29/40 28 56 50.00 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 236 500 47.20 6 GORDON BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 3/40 11 32 34.37 3 JACK JOHNSON L 4/42 6 28 21.42 1 TONY RONDOW L 13/43 16 42 38.09 5 JERRY MELISSA W 42/21 22 38 57.89 4 MIKE THOMPSON L 37/40 24 56 42.85 2 BUDDY DYRDA L 21/40 26 52 50.00 3 JACK JOHNSON W 43/34 19 46 41.30 1 TONY RONDOW L 18/40 22 48 45.83 5 JERRY MELISSA L 14/41 17 46 36.95 4 MIKE THOMPSON L 33/42 20 50 40.00 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 183 438 41.78 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM BALAZS BC 4169 8 2 377 193 438 44.06% 2* VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 7 3 380 213 530 40.18% 3* BILL NEARGARTH BC 3608 7 3 378 185 478 38.70% 4 LOU BUSCH BC 4857 5 5 271 147 460 31.95% 5 RON DENMAN BC 0599 3 7 304 163 488 33.40% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 0 10 232 122 482 25.31% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM BALAZS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VINCE HERKEL L 30/40 18 50 36.00 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 15/40 13 38 34.21 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 41/21 24 48 50.00 4 LOU BUSCH W 41/8 17 36 47.22 5 RON DENMAN W 42/34 23 62 37.09 2 VINCE HERKEL W 40/33 26 60 43.33 3 BILL NEARGARTH W 44/25 20 44 45.45 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 43/8 15 36 41.66 4 LOU BUSCH W 40/1 15 26 57.69 5 RON DENMAN W 41/11 22 38 57.89 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 193 438 44.06 2* VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM BALAZS W 40/30 21 50 42.00 4 LOU BUSCH W 40/26 23 58 39.65 5 RON DENMAN W 40/19 18 38 47.36 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/32 24 52 46.15 3 BILL NEARGARTH W 40/32 26 60 43.33 1 TOM BALAZS L 33/40 23 60 38.33 4 LOU BUSCH L 27/40 16 50 32.00 5 RON DENMAN W 42/21 25 52 48.07 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 45/23 20 56 35.71 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 31/41 17 54 31.48 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 213 530 40.18 3* BILL NEARGARTH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/26 15 44 34.09 1 TOM BALAZS W 40/15 22 38 57.89 4 LOU BUSCH W 40/16 20 38 52.63 5 RON DENMAN W 40/27 17 38 44.73 2 VINCE HERKEL L 32/40 23 60 38.33 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 41/39 20 62 32.25 1 TOM BALAZS L 25/44 13 44 29.54 4 LOU BUSCH W 40/16 19 44 43.18 5 RON DENMAN L 39/40 18 56 32.14 2 VINCE HERKEL W 41/31 18 54 33.33 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 185 478 38.70 4 LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 RON DENMAN W 41/28 22 56 39.28 2 VINCE HERKEL L 26/40 20 58 34.48 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 16/40 13 38 34.21 1 TOM BALAZS L 8/41 7 36 19.44 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/21 13 42 30.95 5 RON DENMAN W 43/39 22 58 37.93 2 VINCE HERKEL W 40/27 19 50 38.00 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 16/40 12 44 27.27 1 TOM BALAZS L 1/40 4 26 15.38 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/29 15 52 28.84 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 147 460 31.95 5 RON DENMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LOU BUSCH L 28/41 18 56 32.14 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/21 16 48 33.33 2 VINCE HERKEL L 19/40 11 38 28.94 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 27/40 13 38 34.21 1 TOM BALAZS L 34/42 19 62 30.64 4 LOU BUSCH L 39/43 20 58 34.48 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 45/12 20 42 47.61 2 VINCE HERKEL L 21/42 17 52 32.69 3 BILL NEARGARTH W 40/39 18 56 32.14 1 TOM BALAZS L 11/41 11 38 28.94 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 163 488 33.40 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 26/40 11 44 25.00 5 RON DENMAN L 21/40 12 48 25.00 1 TOM BALAZS L 21/41 19 48 39.58 2 VINCE HERKEL L 32/42 19 52 36.53 4 LOU BUSCH L 21/40 7 42 16.66 3 BILL NEARGARTH L 39/41 19 62 30.64 5 RON DENMAN L 12/45 9 42 21.42 1 TOM BALAZS L 8/43 3 36 8.33 2 VINCE HERKEL L 23/45 12 56 21.42 4 LOU BUSCH L 29/40 11 52 21.15 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 122 482 25.31 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK BC 0738 8 2 342 155 494 31.37% 2 MIKE POTREBENKO BC 0709 7 3 330 145 456 31.79% 3 STEVE CAYER BC 0737 6 4 325 138 492 28.04% 4 SAM TAYLOR BC 1288 5 5 295 118 450 26.22% 5 DEREK GREVELING BC 0986 3 7 281 127 488 26.02% 6 RAY JEROME BC 1282 1 9 231 110 488 22.54% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 STEVE CAYER W 35/32 16 60 26.66 4 SAM TAYLOR W 35/29 16 48 33.33 6 RAY JEROME W 37/22 17 48 35.41 5 DEREK GREVELING W 36/25 15 44 34.09 2 MIKE POTREBENKO W 35/28 20 50 40.00 3 STEVE CAYER L 24/36 10 50 20.00 4 SAM TAYLOR W 35/13 17 42 40.47 6 RAY JEROME W 36/25 20 50 40.00 5 DEREK GREVELING W 35/27 15 44 34.09 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 34/36 9 58 15.51 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 155 494 31.37 2 MIKE POTREBENKO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DEREK GREVELING W 35/16 11 34 32.35 3 STEVE CAYER L 21/37 11 46 23.91 4 SAM TAYLOR W 35/12 12 30 40.00 6 RAY JEROME W 36/21 16 40 40.00 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 28/35 18 50 36.00 5 DEREK GREVELING W 38/34 20 56 35.71 3 STEVE CAYER L 30/35 15 54 27.77 4 SAM TAYLOR W 36/29 16 46 34.78 6 RAY JEROME W 35/16 16 42 38.09 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 36/34 10 58 17.24 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 145 456 31.79 3 STEVE CAYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 32/35 14 60 23.33 2 MIKE POTREBENKO W 37/21 16 46 34.78 5 DEREK GREVELING W 37/23 15 44 34.09 4 SAM TAYLOR L 20/35 9 38 23.68 6 RAY JEROME W 35/20 14 44 31.81 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 36/24 13 50 26.00 2 MIKE POTREBENKO W 35/30 17 54 31.48 5 DEREK GREVELING L 21/36 10 58 17.24 4 SAM TAYLOR L 34/36 13 48 27.08 6 RAY JEROME W 38/24 17 50 34.00 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 138 492 28.04 4 SAM TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 RAY JEROME W 36/10 9 50 18.00 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 29/35 12 48 25.00 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 12/35 5 30 16.66 3 STEVE CAYER W 35/20 13 38 34.21 5 DEREK GREVELING L 30/39 14 56 25.00 6 RAY JEROME W 40/27 14 52 26.92 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 13/35 10 42 23.80 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 29/36 13 46 28.26 3 STEVE CAYER W 36/34 16 48 33.33 5 DEREK GREVELING W 35/29 12 40 30.00 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 118 450 26.22 5 DEREK GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 16/35 6 34 17.64 6 RAY JEROME W 37/30 10 62 16.12 3 STEVE CAYER L 23/37 12 44 27.27 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 25/36 12 44 27.27 4 SAM TAYLOR W 39/30 17 56 30.35 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 34/38 20 56 35.71 6 RAY JEROME L 15/36 9 50 18.00 3 STEVE CAYER W 36/21 16 58 27.58 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 27/35 14 44 31.81 4 SAM TAYLOR L 29/35 11 40 27.50 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 127 488 26.02 6 RAY JEROME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SAM TAYLOR L 10/36 4 50 8.00 5 DEREK GREVELING L 30/37 10 62 16.12 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 22/37 12 48 25.00 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 21/36 11 40 27.50 3 STEVE CAYER L 20/35 9 44 20.45 4 SAM TAYLOR L 27/40 13 52 25.00 5 DEREK GREVELING W 36/15 12 50 24.00 1 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 25/36 15 50 30.00 2 MIKE POTREBENKO L 16/35 9 42 21.42 3 STEVE CAYER L 24/38 15 50 30.00 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 110 488 22.54 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DON MCSWAIN BC 1237 8 2 349 113 476 23.73% 2 SANTE MICHIELIN BC 4061 6 4 299 122 464 26.29% 3* TREVOR GREVELING BC 0991 5 5 276 114 490 23.26% 4* JIM MANTON BC 0998 5 5 273 102 472 21.61% 5** SERGE DUBE BC 0885 3 7 266 98 528 18.56% 6** OLIVER WATKINS BC 0001 3 7 237 79 466 16.95% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DON MCSWAIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 30/35 13 54 24.07 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 36/21 10 52 19.23 5 SERGE DUBE W 38/21 8 56 14.28 4 JIM MANTON W 37/10 12 34 35.29 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 35/22 13 42 30.95 2 SANTE MICHIELIN W 37/17 11 48 22.91 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 36/10 10 36 27.77 5 SERGE DUBE W 36/28 15 62 24.19 4 JIM MANTON L 28/36 9 54 16.66 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 36/22 12 38 31.57 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 113 476 23.73 2 SANTE MICHIELIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DON MCSWAIN W 35/30 17 54 31.48 5 SERGE DUBE W 35/15 13 50 26.00 4 JIM MANTON W 36/13 14 38 36.84 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 34/37 17 54 31.48 6 OLIVER WATKINS L 21/35 11 46 23.91 1 DON MCSWAIN L 17/37 7 48 14.58 5 SERGE DUBE W 38/23 14 50 28.00 4 JIM MANTON L 7/39 2 32 6.25 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 37/13 14 46 30.43 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 39/23 13 46 28.26 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 122 464 26.29 3* TREVOR GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SERGE DUBE W 35/25 12 46 26.08 4 JIM MANTON W 35/22 12 60 20.00 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 35/26 13 48 27.08 2 SANTE MICHIELIN W 37/34 17 54 31.48 1 DON MCSWAIN L 22/35 10 42 23.80 5 SERGE DUBE L 19/35 10 52 19.23 4 JIM MANTON L 23/38 9 50 18.00 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 35/19 14 54 25.92 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 13/37 6 46 13.04 1 DON MCSWAIN L 22/36 11 38 28.94 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 114 490 23.26 4* JIM MANTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 OLIVER WATKINS L 13/36 5 46 10.86 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 22/35 9 60 15.00 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 13/36 7 38 18.42 1 DON MCSWAIN L 10/37 2 34 5.88 5 SERGE DUBE W 36/19 15 50 30.00 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 37/7 15 42 35.71 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 38/23 14 50 28.00 2 SANTE MICHIELIN W 39/7 11 32 34.37 1 DON MCSWAIN W 36/28 13 54 24.07 5 SERGE DUBE L 29/38 11 66 16.66 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 102 472 21.61 5** SERGE DUBE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 25/35 9 46 19.56 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 15/35 4 50 8.00 1 DON MCSWAIN L 21/38 3 56 5.35 6 OLIVER WATKINS L 22/38 8 46 17.39 4 JIM MANTON L 19/36 9 50 18.00 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 35/19 15 52 28.84 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 23/38 7 50 14.00 1 DON MCSWAIN L 28/36 15 62 24.19 6 OLIVER WATKINS W 40/22 14 50 28.00 4 JIM MANTON W 38/29 14 66 21.21 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 98 528 18.56 6** OLIVER WATKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JIM MANTON W 36/13 9 46 19.56 1 DON MCSWAIN L 21/36 6 52 11.53 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 26/35 10 48 20.83 5 SERGE DUBE W 38/22 9 46 19.56 2 SANTE MICHIELIN W 35/21 11 46 23.91 4 JIM MANTON L 7/37 6 42 14.28 1 DON MCSWAIN L 10/36 3 36 8.33 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 19/35 6 54 11.11 5 SERGE DUBE L 22/40 10 50 20.00 2 SANTE MICHIELIN L 23/39 9 46 19.56 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 79 466 16.95 MEN - CLASS E (30 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM MOFFAT BC 4016 8 2 267 92 362 25.41% 2* TERRY GIFFIN BC 1012 6 4 273 89 416 21.39% 3* TOM HARRIS BC 0525 6 4 276 74 400 18.50% 4* DARRELL KOLODZIEJAK BC 1080 6 4 269 85 474 17.93% 5 SHANE SNOW BC 4050 3 7 214 65 428 15.18% 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA BC 4064 1 9 135 37 376 9.84% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM MOFFAT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 31/4 9 22 40.90 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 20/32 10 46 21.73 5 SHANE SNOW W 30/15 12 36 33.33 2 TERRY GIFFIN W 32/24 11 40 27.50 3 TOM HARRIS W 30/14 8 32 25.00 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 32/6 8 30 26.66 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK W 30/26 12 46 26.08 5 SHANE SNOW W 30/23 10 52 19.23 2 TERRY GIFFIN W 32/20 11 38 28.94 3 TOM HARRIS L 0/31 1 20 5.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 92 362 25.41 2* TERRY GIFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SHANE SNOW W 30/18 7 46 15.21 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 30/14 7 34 20.58 3 TOM HARRIS L 22/32 6 38 15.78 1 TOM MOFFAT L 24/32 10 40 25.00 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 17/31 6 46 13.04 5 SHANE SNOW W 32/22 12 42 28.57 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 35/9 8 40 20.00 3 TOM HARRIS W 32/29 9 48 18.75 1 TOM MOFFAT L 20/32 9 38 23.68 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK W 31/18 15 44 34.09 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 89 416 21.39 3* TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK W 32/24 12 58 20.68 5 SHANE SNOW W 32/9 10 38 26.31 2 TERRY GIFFIN W 32/22 10 38 26.31 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 32/2 8 28 28.57 1 TOM MOFFAT L 14/30 3 32 9.37 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 27/34 5 54 9.25 5 SHANE SNOW L 15/30 3 46 6.52 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 29/32 6 48 12.50 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 32/15 9 38 23.68 1 TOM MOFFAT W 31/0 8 20 40.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 74 400 18.50 4* DARRELL KOLODZIEJAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TOM HARRIS L 24/32 10 58 17.24 1 TOM MOFFAT W 32/20 11 46 23.91 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 31/13 9 44 20.45 5 SHANE SNOW W 30/11 7 46 15.21 2 TERRY GIFFIN W 31/17 9 46 19.56 3 TOM HARRIS W 34/27 9 54 16.66 1 TOM MOFFAT L 26/30 9 46 19.56 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 31/22 6 54 11.11 5 SHANE SNOW L 12/32 4 36 11.11 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 18/31 11 44 25.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 85 474 17.93 5 SHANE SNOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 18/30 5 46 10.86 3 TOM HARRIS L 9/32 3 38 7.89 1 TOM MOFFAT L 15/30 8 36 22.22 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 11/30 4 46 8.69 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA W 32/19 5 46 10.86 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 22/32 9 42 21.42 3 TOM HARRIS W 30/15 9 46 19.56 1 TOM MOFFAT L 23/30 8 52 15.38 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK W 32/12 9 36 25.00 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA L 22/31 5 40 12.50 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 65 428 15.18 6 HIROFUMI YOKOTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM MOFFAT L 4/31 1 22 4.54 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 14/30 3 34 8.82 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 13/31 6 44 13.63 3 TOM HARRIS L 2/32 0 28 None 5 SHANE SNOW L 19/32 4 46 8.69 1 TOM MOFFAT L 6/32 1 30 3.33 2 TERRY GIFFIN L 9/35 1 40 2.50 4 DARR KOLODZIEJAK L 22/31 7 54 12.96 3 TOM HARRIS L 15/32 6 38 15.78 5 SHANE SNOW W 31/22 8 40 20.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 37 376 9.84 MEN - CLASS F (25 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON BC 0272 9 1 253 77 422 18.24% 2 CHRIS MACDONALD BC 4086 6 4 227 73 428 17.05% 3 DUKE SNIDER BC 3604 5 5 226 55 448 12.27% 4 PHIL KREPPS BC 1460 4 6 223 63 438 14.38% 5* JIM MILLAR BC 4033 3 7 208 62 410 15.12% 6* JOHN HAMLER BC 0119 3 7 174 57 414 13.76% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JIM MILLAR W 27/14 11 36 30.55 3 DUKE SNIDER W 27/13 6 36 16.66 2 CHRIS MACDONALD W 25/12 5 42 11.90 4 PHIL KREPPS W 25/19 6 54 11.11 6 JOHN HAMLER W 25/18 5 40 12.50 5 JIM MILLAR W 25/15 8 36 22.22 3 DUKE SNIDER W 25/22 10 48 20.83 2 CHRIS MACDONALD W 28/23 11 42 26.19 4 PHIL KREPPS L 21/28 9 54 16.66 6 JOHN HAMLER W 25/6 6 34 17.64 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 77 422 18.24 2 CHRIS MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 PHIL KREPPS W 26/23 10 46 21.73 6 JOHN HAMLER L 22/26 7 42 16.66 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 12/25 3 42 7.14 3 DUKE SNIDER W 26/14 6 42 14.28 5 JIM MILLAR W 26/16 8 28 28.57 4 PHIL KREPPS L 13/25 4 28 14.28 6 JOHN HAMLER W 27/18 9 52 17.30 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 23/28 11 42 26.19 3 DUKE SNIDER W 26/23 8 60 13.33 5 JIM MILLAR W 26/24 7 46 15.21 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 73 428 17.05 3 DUKE SNIDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOHN HAMLER W 27/10 5 36 13.88 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 13/27 4 36 11.11 5 JIM MILLAR L 21/25 5 40 12.50 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 14/26 3 42 7.14 4 PHIL KREPPS W 28/17 7 44 15.90 6 JOHN HAMLER W 26/17 5 44 11.36 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 22/25 9 48 18.75 5 JIM MILLAR W 25/23 6 50 12.00 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 23/26 4 60 6.66 4 PHIL KREPPS W 27/18 7 48 14.58 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 55 448 12.27 4 PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 23/26 5 46 10.86 5 JIM MILLAR W 28/22 12 48 25.00 6 JOHN HAMLER W 25/9 5 36 13.88 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 19/25 5 54 9.25 3 DUKE SNIDER L 17/28 5 44 11.36 2 CHRIS MACDONALD W 25/13 5 28 17.85 5 JIM MILLAR L 19/26 5 38 13.15 6 JOHN HAMLER L 21/25 5 42 11.90 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON W 28/21 12 54 22.22 3 DUKE SNIDER L 18/27 4 48 8.33 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 63 438 14.38 5* JIM MILLAR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 14/27 8 36 22.22 4 PHIL KREPPS L 22/28 10 48 20.83 3 DUKE SNIDER W 25/21 7 40 17.50 6 JOHN HAMLER W 26/18 3 50 6.00 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 16/26 4 28 14.28 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 15/25 5 36 13.88 4 PHIL KREPPS W 26/19 8 38 21.05 3 DUKE SNIDER L 23/25 5 50 10.00 6 JOHN HAMLER L 17/27 4 38 10.52 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 24/26 8 46 17.39 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 62 410 15.12 6* JOHN HAMLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DUKE SNIDER L 10/27 3 36 8.33 2 CHRIS MACDONALD W 26/22 9 42 21.42 4 PHIL KREPPS L 9/25 4 36 11.11 5 JIM MILLAR L 18/26 4 50 8.00 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 18/25 6 40 15.00 3 DUKE SNIDER L 17/26 3 44 6.81 2 CHRIS MACDONALD L 18/27 7 52 13.46 4 PHIL KREPPS W 25/21 7 42 16.66 5 JIM MILLAR W 27/17 10 38 26.31 1 PHILIP DAVIDSON L 6/25 4 34 11.76 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 57 414 13.76 MEN - CLASS G (25Pts/40Sh) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM FINNIE BC 0007 9 1 241 53 328 16.15% 2 BOB BARKER BC 1289 8 2 222 54 350 15.42% 3 NICK NICHOLAS BC 1044 6 4 188 49 340 14.41% 4 FRANK HUBICK BC 0880 4 6 188 43 378 11.37% 5 GEORGE TAYLOR BC 4147 3 7 136 28 372 7.52% 6 SCOTT MUNFORD BC 4004 0 10 79 18 328 5.48% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM FINNIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB BARKER W 25/12 5 30 16.66 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 23/13 4 40 10.00 4 FRANK HUBICK W 25/23 5 44 11.36 3 NICK NICHOLAS W 25/10 6 34 17.64 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 25/7 5 30 16.66 2 BOB BARKER W 25/12 6 32 18.75 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 26/9 6 26 23.07 4 FRANK HUBICK W 24/18 6 40 15.00 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 18/25 4 34 11.76 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 25/0 6 18 33.33 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 53 328 16.15 2 BOB BARKER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM FINNIE L 12/25 2 30 6.66 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 23/20 5 40 12.50 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 26/20 9 40 22.50 4 FRANK HUBICK W 23/11 6 40 15.00 3 NICK NICHOLAS W 27/15 8 36 22.22 1 TOM FINNIE L 12/25 1 32 3.12 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 25/6 1 34 2.94 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 26/7 5 40 12.50 4 FRANK HUBICK W 23/19 10 40 25.00 3 NICK NICHOLAS W 25/7 7 18 38.88 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 54 350 15.42 3 NICK NICHOLAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 16/21 5 40 12.50 4 FRANK HUBICK W 23/15 6 40 15.00 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 26/7 6 30 20.00 1 TOM FINNIE L 10/25 3 34 8.82 2 BOB BARKER L 15/27 6 36 16.66 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 25/9 6 28 21.42 4 FRANK HUBICK W 17/11 4 40 10.00 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 24/8 4 40 10.00 1 TOM FINNIE W 25/18 7 34 20.58 2 BOB BARKER L 7/25 2 18 11.11 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 49 340 14.41 4 FRANK HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 26/4 5 28 17.85 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 15/23 3 40 7.50 1 TOM FINNIE L 23/25 4 44 9.09 2 BOB BARKER L 11/23 4 40 10.00 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 25/9 5 38 13.15 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 25/4 3 28 10.71 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 11/17 5 40 12.50 1 TOM FINNIE L 18/24 4 40 10.00 2 BOB BARKER L 19/23 9 40 22.50 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 15/12 1 40 2.50 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 43 378 11.37 5 GEORGE TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 NICK NICHOLAS W 21/16 5 40 12.50 1 TOM FINNIE L 13/23 3 40 7.50 2 BOB BARKER L 20/26 6 40 15.00 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 21/9 3 40 7.50 4 FRANK HUBICK L 9/25 2 38 5.26 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 9/25 2 28 7.14 1 TOM FINNIE L 9/26 3 26 11.53 2 BOB BARKER L 7/26 2 40 5.00 6 SCOTT MUNFORD W 15/14 0 40 None 4 FRANK HUBICK L 12/15 2 40 5.00 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 28 372 7.52 6 SCOTT MUNFORD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 FRANK HUBICK L 4/26 1 28 3.57 2 BOB BARKER L 20/23 3 40 7.50 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 7/26 1 30 3.33 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 9/21 1 40 2.50 1 TOM FINNIE L 7/25 3 30 10.00 4 FRANK HUBICK L 4/25 1 28 3.57 2 BOB BARKER L 6/25 2 34 5.88 3 NICK NICHOLAS L 8/24 2 40 5.00 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 14/15 4 40 10.00 1 TOM FINNIE L 0/25 0 18 None (Was 11%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 18 328 5.48 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 8 0 332 250 392 63.77% 2 MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 6 2 307 234 408 57.35% 3* WAYNE HODGINS BC 4097 3 5 285 232 432 53.70% 4* EARL MORRIS BC 3302 3 5 259 186 402 46.26% 5 JERRY HARACH BC 1751 0 8 145 117 318 36.79% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS W 42/35 38 64 59.37 5 JERRY HARACH W 42/29 26 48 54.16 3 WAYNE HODGINS W 42/20 30 46 65.21 2 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/24 34 50 68.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS W 40/10 24 38 63.15 5 JERRY HARACH W 41/4 18 24 75.00 3 WAYNE HODGINS W 43/31 44 66 66.66 2 MURRAY RAYNER W 42/37 36 56 64.28 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 8 L 0 250 392 63.77 2 MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 WAYNE HODGINS W 41/34 37 60 61.66 5 JERRY HARACH W 40/25 25 48 52.08 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS W 40/36 28 60 46.66 1 WILF GREGORY L 24/40 28 50 56.00 3 WAYNE HODGINS W 41/37 33 62 53.22 5 JERRY HARACH W 42/3 14 18 77.77 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS W 42/26 34 54 62.96 1 WILF GREGORY L 37/42 35 56 62.50 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 6 L 2 234 408 57.35 3* WAYNE HODGINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 34/41 33 60 55.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS L 35/41 25 50 50.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 20/42 22 46 47.82 5 JERRY HARACH W 42/32 36 64 56.25 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 37/41 32 62 51.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 EARL MORRIS W 43/30 25 52 48.07 1 WILF GREGORY L 31/43 42 66 63.63 5 JERRY HARACH W 43/6 17 32 53.12 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 232 432 53.70 4* EARL MORRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JERRY HARACH W 40/35 17 50 34.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 35/42 34 64 53.12 3 WAYNE HODGINS W 41/35 27 50 54.00 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 36/40 26 60 43.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 JERRY HARACH W 41/11 18 34 52.94 1 WILF GREGORY L 10/40 15 38 39.47 3 WAYNE HODGINS L 30/43 20 52 38.46 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 26/42 29 54 53.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 186 402 46.26 5 JERRY HARACH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 EARL MORRIS L 35/40 18 50 36.00 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 25/40 21 48 43.75 1 WILF GREGORY L 29/42 22 48 45.83 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 WAYNE HODGINS L 32/42 34 64 53.12 4 EARL MORRIS L 11/41 8 34 23.52 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 3/42 1 18 5.55 1 WILF GREGORY L 4/41 6 24 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 WAYNE HODGINS L 6/43 7 32 21.87 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 0 L 8 117 318 36.79 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ERLE SALMON BC 3621 8 3 399 222 554 40.07% 2 REAL PREFONTAINE BC 3602 7 4 399 239 588 40.64% 3* BOB BLUETT BC 1006 5 5 337 208 536 38.80% 4* WALTER KUTZNER BC 3970 5 5 335 187 518 36.10% 5** EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 3 7 267 152 494 30.76% 6** TED KUPFERSHMID BC 0507 3 7 268 151 506 29.84% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ERLE SALMON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 17/40 15 48 31.25 3 BOB BLUETT W 40/22 21 44 47.72 5 EARLE GILLARD W 43/10 20 40 50.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/15 21 52 40.38 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 40/26 23 56 41.07 2 REAL PREFONTAINE W 40/29 24 58 41.37 3 BOB BLUETT W 41/39 27 70 38.57 5 EARLE GILLARD L 29/42 15 44 34.09 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 26/40 12 46 26.08 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 41/20 24 48 50.00 2 REAL PREFONTAINE W 42/36 20 48 41.66 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 222 554 40.07 2 REAL PREFONTAINE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ERLE SALMON W 40/17 22 48 45.83 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/13 18 42 42.85 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 40/22 24 50 48.00 5 EARLE GILLARD W 41/14 20 46 43.47 3 BOB BLUETT L 29/40 27 68 39.70 1 ERLE SALMON L 29/40 19 58 32.75 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/36 31 78 39.74 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 43/37 21 52 40.38 5 EARLE GILLARD L 21/40 18 48 37.50 3 BOB BLUETT W 40/22 22 50 44.00 1 ERLE SALMON L 36/42 17 48 35.41 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 239 588 40.64 3* BOB BLUETT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 EARLE GILLARD W 42/28 24 66 36.36 1 ERLE SALMON L 22/40 15 44 34.09 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 42/13 16 40 40.00 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 26/45 27 68 39.70 2 REAL PREFONTAINE W 40/29 30 68 44.11 5 EARLE GILLARD W 41/12 17 30 56.66 1 ERLE SALMON L 39/41 26 70 37.14 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 22/40 15 54 27.77 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 41/20 22 46 47.82 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 22/40 16 50 32.00 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 208 536 38.80 4* WALTER KUTZNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/25 18 50 36.00 5 EARLE GILLARD W 42/32 21 56 37.50 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 22/40 16 50 32.00 3 BOB BLUETT W 45/26 30 68 44.11 1 ERLE SALMON L 26/40 19 56 33.92 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 41/12 16 36 44.44 5 EARLE GILLARD W 42/25 22 56 39.28 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 37/43 17 52 32.69 3 BOB BLUETT L 20/41 13 46 28.26 1 ERLE SALMON L 20/41 15 48 31.25 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 187 518 36.10 5** EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BOB BLUETT L 28/42 18 66 27.27 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 32/42 18 56 32.14 1 ERLE SALMON L 10/43 9 40 22.50 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 14/41 8 46 17.39 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 41/33 17 62 27.41 3 BOB BLUETT L 12/41 7 30 23.33 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 25/42 17 56 30.35 1 ERLE SALMON W 42/29 18 44 40.90 2 REAL PREFONTAINE W 40/21 22 48 45.83 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 23/41 18 46 39.13 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 152 494 30.76 6** TED KUPFERSHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 25/40 13 50 26.00 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 13/40 8 42 19.04 3 BOB BLUETT L 13/42 6 40 15.00 1 ERLE SALMON L 15/40 11 52 21.15 5 EARLE GILLARD L 33/41 15 62 24.19 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 12/41 8 36 22.22 2 REAL PREFONTAINE L 36/40 29 78 37.17 3 BOB BLUETT W 40/22 21 54 38.88 1 ERLE SALMON W 40/26 17 46 36.95 5 EARLE GILLARD W 41/23 23 46 50.00 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 151 506 29.84 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ALFIE LOHR BC 4012 7 2 309 119 398 29.89% 2 RUSS ATKINSON BC 1045 6 3 291 111 362 30.66% 3 AL CHARTERS BC 1072 4 5 247 89 406 21.92% 4 BOB KIRK BC 3955 1 8 155 73 346 21.09% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ALFIE LOHR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 27/36 15 50 30.00 4 BOB KIRK W 36/14 10 40 25.00 3 AL CHARTERS W 37/15 11 46 23.91 2 RUSS ATKINSON W 38/24 18 52 34.61 4 BOB KIRK W 38/11 18 42 42.85 3 AL CHARTERS W 35/25 15 46 32.60 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 23/35 9 42 21.42 4 BOB KIRK W 37/17 12 34 35.29 3 AL CHARTERS W 38/30 11 46 23.91 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 119 398 29.89 2 RUSS ATKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ALFIE LOHR W 36/27 17 50 34.00 3 AL CHARTERS L 32/35 12 54 22.22 4 BOB KIRK W 38/6 12 30 40.00 1 ALFIE LOHR L 24/38 13 52 25.00 3 AL CHARTERS L 15/35 6 32 18.75 4 BOB KIRK W 37/3 10 24 41.66 1 ALFIE LOHR W 35/23 15 42 35.71 3 AL CHARTERS W 37/13 13 42 30.95 4 BOB KIRK W 37/19 13 36 36.11 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 111 362 30.66 3 AL CHARTERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BOB KIRK W 35/21 10 50 20.00 2 RUSS ATKINSON W 35/32 14 54 25.92 1 ALFIE LOHR L 15/37 4 46 8.69 4 BOB KIRK L 23/36 9 40 22.50 2 RUSS ATKINSON W 35/15 12 32 37.50 1 ALFIE LOHR L 25/35 13 46 28.26 4 BOB KIRK W 36/28 12 50 24.00 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 13/37 6 42 14.28 1 ALFIE LOHR L 30/38 9 46 19.56 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 89 406 21.92 4 BOB KIRK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 AL CHARTERS L 21/35 10 50 20.00 1 ALFIE LOHR L 14/36 6 40 15.00 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 6/38 3 30 10.00 3 AL CHARTERS W 36/23 13 40 32.50 1 ALFIE LOHR L 11/38 11 42 26.19 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 3/37 1 24 4.16 3 AL CHARTERS L 28/36 12 50 24.00 1 ALFIE LOHR L 17/37 8 34 23.52 2 RUSS ATKINSON L 19/37 9 36 25.00 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 73 346 21.09 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (30 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 STEW BATTIE BC 2886 7 1 249 80 332 24.09% 2 CHUCK STREIFEL BC 0000 6 2 221 71 320 22.18% 3 ROLLIE CALESTAGNE BC 0047 3 5 184 48 354 13.55% 4* BOB FEDORUK BC 0289 2 6 140 48 314 15.28% 5* GEORGE GILES BC 1013 2 6 184 56 368 15.21% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 STEW BATTIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE W 31/12 10 40 25.00 5 GEORGE GILES W 32/18 13 46 28.26 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 29/30 8 50 16.00 4 BOB FEDORUK W 35/22 14 42 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE W 30/12 9 34 26.47 5 GEORGE GILES W 30/22 7 50 14.00 2 CHUCK STREIFEL W 30/17 10 36 27.77 4 BOB FEDORUK W 32/19 9 34 26.47 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 80 332 24.09 2 CHUCK STREIFEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BOB FEDORUK W 32/3 8 28 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE W 31/17 10 50 20.00 1 STEW BATTIE W 30/29 9 50 18.00 5 GEORGE GILES W 32/23 13 46 28.26 4 BOB FEDORUK W 30/9 9 30 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE L 17/30 7 44 15.90 1 STEW BATTIE L 17/30 6 36 16.66 5 GEORGE GILES W 32/11 9 36 25.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 6 L 2 71 320 22.18 3 ROLLIE CALESTAGNE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 GEORGE GILES L 24/32 8 58 13.79 1 STEW BATTIE L 12/31 4 40 10.00 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 17/31 2 50 4.00 4 BOB FEDORUK L 29/32 8 54 14.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE GILES W 30/26 8 40 20.00 1 STEW BATTIE L 12/30 2 34 5.88 2 CHUCK STREIFEL W 30/17 9 44 20.45 4 BOB FEDORUK W 30/8 7 34 20.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 10%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 48 354 13.55 4* BOB FEDORUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 3/32 1 28 3.57 5 GEORGE GILES L 15/31 5 40 12.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE W 32/29 9 54 16.66 1 STEW BATTIE L 22/35 9 42 21.42 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 9/30 4 30 13.33 5 GEORGE GILES W 32/21 10 52 19.23 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE L 8/30 4 34 11.76 1 STEW BATTIE L 19/32 6 34 17.64 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 48 314 15.28 5* GEORGE GILES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE W 32/24 11 58 18.96 4 BOB FEDORUK W 31/15 4 40 10.00 1 STEW BATTIE L 18/32 8 46 17.39 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 23/32 11 46 23.91 3 ROLLI CALESTAGNE L 26/30 9 40 22.50 4 BOB FEDORUK L 21/32 7 52 13.46 1 STEW BATTIE L 22/30 3 50 6.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 CHUCK STREIFEL L 11/32 3 36 8.33 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 56 368 15.21