THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 JUNIORS - CLASS A (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 MATHEW MACDONALD BC 7775 7 1 274 129 300 43.00% 2 SAM DEGRAAF BC 1468 5 3 242 117 352 33.23% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF BC 1467 0 8 124 80 300 26.66% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 MATHEW MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 36/0 17 22 77.27 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 37/32 23 60 38.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 35/4 18 42 42.85 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 19/37 12 46 26.08 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 39/9 14 26 53.84 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 37/27 17 44 38.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 35/12 13 34 38.23 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 36/4 15 26 57.69 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 129 300 43.00 2 SAM DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 35/32 15 44 34.09 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 32/37 21 60 35.00 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 35/28 18 48 37.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 MATHEW MACDONALD W 37/19 17 46 36.95 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 37/13 13 38 34.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 27/37 14 44 31.81 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 35/26 14 46 30.43 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 4/36 5 26 19.23 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 117 352 33.23 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 32/35 14 44 31.81 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 0/36 6 22 27.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 28/35 17 48 35.41 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 4/35 10 42 23.80 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 13/37 8 38 21.05 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 9/39 5 26 19.23 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 26/35 11 46 23.91 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 12/35 9 34 26.47 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 26%) TOTALS W 0 L 8 80 300 26.66 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 JUNIORS - CLASS B (25Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN BC 1560 5 3 165 36 316 11.39% 2 NICOLE DABNEY BC 5001 3 5 139 35 316 11.07% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 NICOLE DABNEY W 16/12 1 40 2.50 2 NICOLE DABNEY L 17/20 5 40 12.50 2 NICOLE DABNEY W 28/10 6 36 16.66 2 NICOLE DABNEY W 23/22 8 40 20.00 2 NICOLE DABNEY L 20/23 4 40 10.00 2 NICOLE DABNEY L 20/22 4 40 10.00 2 NICOLE DABNEY W 22/13 2 40 5.00 2 NICOLE DABNEY W 19/17 6 40 15.00 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 36 316 11.39 2 NICOLE DABNEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN L 12/16 1 40 2.50 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN W 20/17 5 40 12.50 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN L 10/28 2 36 5.55 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN L 22/23 8 40 20.00 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN W 23/20 5 40 12.50 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN W 22/20 6 40 15.00 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN L 13/22 3 40 7.50 1 CHEYANN NEWMAN L 17/19 5 40 12.50 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 35 316 11.07 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 9 0 400 214 332 64.45% 2 DON MORGAN BC 0122 4 5 263 183 402 45.52% 3 MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 3 6 279 187 460 40.65% 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO BC 9758 2 7 182 137 382 35.86% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 41/13 28 40 70.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/6 24 34 70.58 2 DON MORGAN W 40/23 19 32 59.37 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 43/5 17 30 56.66 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/12 24 42 57.14 2 DON MORGAN W 41/7 28 36 77.77 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 42/12 26 36 72.22 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 72/42 24 44 54.54 2 DON MORGAN W 40/16 24 38 63.15 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 9 L 0 214 332 64.45 2 DON MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 12/40 20 56 35.71 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 43/33 27 50 54.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 23/40 13 32 40.62 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/34 29 60 48.33 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 41/3 17 24 70.83 1 NEIL YASKOW L 7/41 17 36 47.22 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 36/40 25 64 39.06 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 45/14 19 42 45.23 1 NEIL YASKOW L 16/40 16 38 42.10 (Was 54%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 183 402 45.52 3 MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON MORGAN W 40/12 29 56 51.78 1 NEIL YASKOW L 6/40 13 34 38.23 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 24/41 15 52 28.84 2 DON MORGAN L 34/40 26 60 43.33 1 NEIL YASKOW L 12/41 16 42 38.09 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 44/17 25 44 56.81 2 DON MORGAN W 40/36 24 64 37.50 1 NEIL YASKOW L 42/72 14 44 31.81 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 37/44 25 64 39.06 (Was 54%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 187 460 40.65 4 ANDY DANYLEYKO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NEIL YASKOW L 13/41 19 40 47.50 2 DON MORGAN L 33/43 24 50 48.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/24 18 52 34.61 1 NEIL YASKOW L 5/43 6 30 20.00 2 DON MORGAN L 3/41 5 24 20.83 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 17/44 15 44 34.09 1 NEIL YASKOW L 12/42 15 36 41.66 2 DON MORGAN L 14/45 9 42 21.42 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 44/37 26 64 40.62 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 137 382 35.86 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 7 2 349 194 410 47.31% 2 DARRYL OLSON BC 0921 6 3 314 197 478 41.21% 3 JIM MILLAR BC 4033 5 3 282 150 370 40.54% 4 TED TURNER BC 1773 2 6 274 175 432 40.50% 5 CLARENCE BELLIVEAU BC 4093 1 7 121 77 314 24.52% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR W 41/23 27 52 51.92 2 DARRYL OLSON L 37/43 27 64 42.18 4 TED TURNER W 40/36 27 54 50.00 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 43/7 16 32 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR W 40/19 20 40 50.00 2 DARRYL OLSON L 20/41 15 48 31.25 4 TED TURNER W 42/30 22 48 45.83 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 44/1 18 30 60.00 2 DARRYL OLSON W 42/15 22 42 52.38 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 194 410 47.31 2 DARRYL OLSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JIM MILLAR L 18/41 15 46 32.60 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 42/36 26 58 44.82 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 43/37 30 64 46.87 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 TED TURNER L 28/41 26 66 39.39 3 JIM MILLAR W 44/33 24 56 42.85 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 41/6 15 30 50.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/20 20 48 41.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 TED TURNER W 42/37 27 68 39.70 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 15/42 14 42 33.33 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 197 478 41.21 3 JIM MILLAR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DARRYL OLSON W 41/18 21 46 45.65 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 23/41 21 52 40.38 4 TED TURNER W 43/31 26 56 46.42 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 41/16 14 38 36.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DARRYL OLSON L 33/44 16 56 28.57 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 19/40 11 40 27.50 4 TED TURNER W 40/29 23 48 47.91 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 42/8 18 34 52.94 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 150 370 40.54 4 TED TURNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU W 40/5 17 32 53.12 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR L 31/43 24 56 42.85 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 36/40 24 54 44.44 2 DARRYL OLSON W 41/28 31 66 46.96 5 CLAREN BELLIVEAU L 30/42 16 60 26.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR L 29/40 20 48 41.66 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 30/42 18 48 37.50 2 DARRYL OLSON L 37/42 25 68 36.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 41%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 175 432 40.50 5 CLARENCE BELLIVEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 TED TURNER L 5/40 6 32 18.75 2 DARRYL OLSON L 36/42 23 58 39.65 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR L 16/41 9 38 23.68 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 7/43 5 32 15.62 4 TED TURNER W 42/30 18 60 30.00 2 DARRYL OLSON L 6/41 3 30 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 JIM MILLAR L 8/42 8 34 23.52 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 1/44 5 30 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 45%) TOTALS W 1 L 7 77 314 24.52 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 GEORGE PATER BC 1902 7 3 292 139 426 32.62% 2* JOHN BARRETT BC 0803 6 4 307 165 406 40.64% 3* JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 6 4 301 166 420 39.52% 4* IRVINE THORPE BC 0527 6 4 300 174 476 36.55% 5 BERNIE LEPPER BC 3696 4 6 260 142 410 34.63% 6 MEL MCCLELLAND BC 4769 1 9 203 105 454 23.12% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 GEORGE PATER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JOHN THORNTON L 16/35 15 54 27.77 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 37/10 14 36 38.88 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 35/13 11 26 42.30 2 JOHN BARRETT L 13/36 18 48 37.50 4 IRVINE THORPE W 36/33 19 50 38.00 3 JOHN THORNTON W 35/22 17 54 31.48 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 35/19 8 42 19.04 5 BERNIE LEPPER L 14/38 6 30 20.00 2 JOHN BARRETT W 35/17 14 38 36.84 4 IRVINE THORPE W 36/23 17 48 35.41 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 139 426 32.62 2* JOHN BARRETT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 IRVINE THORPE W 35/9 13 26 50.00 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 35/15 17 44 38.63 3 JOHN THORNTON L 20/38 9 32 28.12 1 GEORGE PATER W 36/13 25 48 52.08 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 38/28 19 48 39.58 4 IRVINE THORPE L 25/38 16 48 33.33 5 BERNIE LEPPER L 26/35 23 52 44.23 3 JOHN THORNTON W 35/25 19 46 41.30 1 GEORGE PATER L 17/35 10 38 26.31 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/0 14 24 58.33 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 165 406 40.64 3* JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GEORGE PATER W 35/16 20 54 37.03 4 IRVINE THORPE W 37/14 21 40 52.50 2 JOHN BARRETT W 38/20 14 32 43.75 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 36/15 24 44 54.54 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 37/6 15 30 50.00 1 GEORGE PATER L 22/35 14 54 25.92 4 IRVINE THORPE L 27/36 14 44 31.81 2 JOHN BARRETT L 25/35 15 46 32.60 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 35/27 17 48 35.41 5 BERNIE LEPPER L 9/35 12 28 42.85 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 166 420 39.52 4* IRVINE THORPE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JOHN BARRETT L 9/35 5 26 19.23 3 JOHN THORNTON L 14/37 14 40 35.00 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 37/31 21 62 33.87 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 38/21 15 44 34.09 1 GEORGE PATER L 33/36 16 50 32.00 2 JOHN BARRETT W 38/25 20 48 41.66 3 JOHN THORNTON W 36/27 19 44 43.18 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 36/20 20 54 37.03 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 36/27 29 60 48.33 1 GEORGE PATER L 23/36 15 48 31.25 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 174 476 36.55 5 BERNIE LEPPER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 MEL MCCLELLAND L 32/35 14 58 24.13 2 JOHN BARRETT L 15/35 10 44 22.72 1 GEORGE PATER L 13/35 4 26 15.38 4 IRVINE THORPE L 21/38 9 44 20.45 3 JOHN THORNTON L 6/37 6 30 20.00 6 MEL MCCLELLAND W 38/18 14 38 36.84 2 JOHN BARRETT W 35/26 25 52 48.07 1 GEORGE PATER W 38/14 15 30 50.00 4 IRVINE THORPE L 27/36 25 60 41.66 3 JOHN THORNTON W 35/9 20 28 71.42 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 142 410 34.63 6 MEL MCCLELLAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BERNIE LEPPER W 35/32 14 58 24.13 1 GEORGE PATER L 10/37 7 36 19.44 4 IRVINE THORPE L 31/37 15 62 24.19 3 JOHN THORNTON L 15/36 17 44 38.63 2 JOHN BARRETT L 28/38 14 48 29.16 5 BERNIE LEPPER L 18/38 7 38 18.42 1 GEORGE PATER L 19/35 4 42 9.52 4 IRVINE THORPE L 20/36 13 54 24.07 3 JOHN THORNTON L 27/35 13 48 27.08 2 JOHN BARRETT L 0/40 1 24 4.16 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 105 454 23.12 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# OZZIE LEAF BC 4940 10 2 338 154 466 33.04% 2* BRIAN RYDER BC 0001 8 3 286 132 410 32.19% 3* TED PETERS BC 4811 8 3 289 126 402 31.34% 4** PHIL KREPPS BC 1459 3 7 191 86 376 22.87% 5** MARCEL PINETTE BC 2137 3 7 229 93 414 22.46% 6 EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 0 10 0 0 0 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# OZZIE LEAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 PHIL KREPPS W 36/27 8 54 14.81 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 37/33 23 58 39.65 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 2 BRIAN RYDER L 24/35 12 46 26.08 3 TED PETERS W 36/27 18 44 40.90 4 PHIL KREPPS W 35/11 13 26 50.00 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 38/34 14 62 22.58 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 2 BRIAN RYDER L 19/39 14 46 30.43 3 TED PETERS W 39/21 21 42 50.00 3 TED PETERS W 37/24 17 46 36.95 2 BRIAN RYDER W 35/24 14 42 33.33 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 10 L 2 154 466 33.04 2* BRIAN RYDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TED PETERS L 11/35 7 34 20.58 4 PHIL KREPPS W 37/25 17 54 31.48 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/25 16 52 30.76 1 OZZIE LEAF W 35/24 17 46 36.95 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 3 TED PETERS L 32/36 15 54 27.77 4 PHIL KREPPS W 35/18 10 44 22.72 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 36/16 17 38 44.73 1 OZZIE LEAF W 39/19 21 46 45.65 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 OZZIE LEAF L 24/35 12 42 28.57 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 132 410 32.19 3* TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BRIAN RYDER W 35/11 13 34 38.23 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 4 PHIL KREPPS W 36/26 16 50 32.00 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/34 16 54 29.62 1 OZZIE LEAF L 27/36 15 44 34.09 2 BRIAN RYDER W 36/32 14 54 25.92 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 4 PHIL KREPPS W 37/13 14 38 36.84 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 36/20 10 40 25.00 1 OZZIE LEAF L 21/39 16 42 38.09 1 OZZIE LEAF L 24/37 12 46 26.08 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 126 402 31.34 4** PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 OZZIE LEAF L 27/36 12 54 22.22 2 BRIAN RYDER L 25/37 12 54 22.22 3 TED PETERS L 26/36 13 50 26.00 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 5 MARCEL PINETTE L 33/36 16 60 26.66 1 OZZIE LEAF L 11/35 6 26 23.07 2 BRIAN RYDER L 18/35 3 44 6.81 3 TED PETERS L 13/37 9 38 23.68 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 5 MARCEL PINETTE W 36/29 15 50 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 86 376 22.87 5** MARCEL PINETTE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 1 OZZIE LEAF L 33/37 21 58 36.20 2 BRIAN RYDER L 25/35 9 52 17.30 3 TED PETERS L 34/35 13 54 24.07 4 PHIL KREPPS W 36/33 10 60 16.66 6 EARLE GILLARD W 1/0 1 OZZIE LEAF L 34/38 15 62 24.19 2 BRIAN RYDER L 16/36 9 38 23.68 3 TED PETERS L 20/36 6 40 15.00 4 PHIL KREPPS L 29/36 10 50 20.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 29%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 93 414 22.46 6 EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MARCEL PINETTE L 0/1 3 TED PETERS L 0/1 1 OZZIE LEAF L 0/1 4 PHIL KREPPS L 0/1 2 BRIAN RYDER L 0/1 5 MARCEL PINETTE L 0/1 3 TED PETERS L 0/1 1 OZZIE LEAF L 0/1 4 PHIL KREPPS L 0/1 2 BRIAN RYDER L 0/1 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 0 0 None This Class Pitched on Day 1 Shift 1 and Day 2 Shift 2 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS E (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BRIAN WARBURTON BC 0000 8 1 250 115 332 34.63% 2 CLIFF BAILEY BC 0118 4 5 200 99 310 31.93% 3* LIONEL HANSON BC 0873 3 6 202 103 318 32.38% 4* TED KUPFERSCHMID BC 0507 3 6 197 72 340 21.17% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BRIAN WARBURTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 30/24 13 38 34.21 2 CLIFF BAILEY W 30/14 13 32 40.62 3 LIONEL HANSON W 30/10 18 36 50.00 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 30/14 14 32 43.75 2 CLIFF BAILEY W 32/18 16 38 42.10 3 LIONEL HANSON L 2/30 4 22 18.18 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 33/28 11 58 18.96 2 CLIFF BAILEY W 33/23 13 34 38.23 3 LIONEL HANSON W 30/28 13 42 30.95 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 115 332 34.63 2 CLIFF BAILEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LIONEL HANSON W 34/4 14 32 43.75 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 14/30 8 32 25.00 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 32/17 13 34 38.23 3 LIONEL HANSON W 30/15 18 40 45.00 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 18/32 13 38 34.21 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 30/16 9 40 22.50 3 LIONEL HANSON L 14/30 10 34 29.41 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 23/33 11 34 32.35 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID L 5/30 3 26 11.53 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 99 310 31.93 3* LIONEL HANSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CLIFF BAILEY L 4/34 6 32 18.75 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID L 25/31 11 42 26.19 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 10/30 11 36 30.55 2 CLIFF BAILEY L 15/30 12 40 30.00 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID W 31/7 11 30 36.66 1 BRIAN WARBURTON W 30/2 14 22 63.63 2 CLIFF BAILEY W 30/14 14 34 41.17 4 TED KUPFERSCHMID L 29/30 11 40 27.50 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 28/30 13 42 30.95 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 103 318 32.38 4* TED KUPFERSCHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 24/30 10 38 26.31 3 LIONEL HANSON W 31/25 13 42 30.95 2 CLIFF BAILEY L 17/32 7 34 20.58 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 14/30 8 32 25.00 3 LIONEL HANSON L 7/31 2 30 6.66 2 CLIFF BAILEY L 16/30 3 40 7.50 1 BRIAN WARBURTON L 28/33 8 58 13.79 3 LIONEL HANSON W 30/29 12 40 30.00 2 CLIFF BAILEY W 30/5 9 26 34.61 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 72 340 21.17 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS F (25Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# GARRY RAYNER BC 0740 8 2 231 45 364 12.36% 2 BILL FLANNIGAN BC 1775 7 3 190 40 372 10.75% 3* BUD PERRY BC 3406 2 7 152 45 342 13.15% 4* MARSHAL MERONIUK BC 1905 2 7 121 41 354 11.58% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# GARRY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 23/16 6 40 15.00 3 BUD PERRY W 28/7 6 34 17.64 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 12/24 0 40 None 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 27/13 7 36 19.44 3 BUD PERRY W 25/19 4 36 11.11 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 19/20 4 40 10.00 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 25/9 4 38 10.52 3 BUD PERRY W 24/22 2 40 5.00 2 BILL FLANNIGAN W 21/18 4 40 10.00 2 BILL FLANNIGAN W 27/1 8 20 40.00 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 45 364 12.36 2 BILL FLANNIGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BUD PERRY L 12/24 2 40 5.00 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 16/14 2 40 5.00 1 GARRY RAYNER W 24/12 4 40 10.00 3 BUD PERRY W 26/8 3 36 8.33 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 23/9 4 40 10.00 1 GARRY RAYNER W 20/19 8 40 20.00 3 BUD PERRY W 25/18 6 36 16.66 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 25/8 4 40 10.00 1 GARRY RAYNER L 18/21 6 40 15.00 1 GARRY RAYNER L 1/27 1 20 5.00 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 40 372 10.75 3* BUD PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BILL FLANNIGAN W 24/12 7 40 17.50 1 GARRY RAYNER L 7/28 3 34 8.82 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 10/17 3 40 7.50 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 8/26 2 36 5.55 1 GARRY RAYNER L 19/25 5 36 13.88 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 20/24 6 40 15.00 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 18/25 4 36 11.11 1 GARRY RAYNER L 22/24 6 40 15.00 4 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 24/11 9 40 22.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 19%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 45 342 13.15 4* MARSHAL MERONIUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GARRY RAYNER L 16/23 8 40 20.00 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 14/16 3 40 7.50 3 BUD PERRY W 17/10 6 40 15.00 1 GARRY RAYNER L 13/27 4 36 11.11 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 9/23 2 40 5.00 3 BUD PERRY W 24/20 7 40 17.50 1 GARRY RAYNER L 9/25 3 38 7.89 2 BILL FLANNIGAN L 8/25 1 40 2.50 3 BUD PERRY L 11/24 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 15%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 41 354 11.58 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 7 2 343 230 374 61.49% 2 VIVIANN FENDLE BC 0558 6 3 320 239 442 54.07% 3 CAROL ORMISTON BC 3903 5 3 281 203 404 50.24% 4 BRENDA ARNOLD BC 3894 3 5 222 173 392 44.13% 5 IDA BOSCHMAN BC 2923 0 8 154 157 364 43.13% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 42/11 23 36 63.88 4 BRENDA ARNOLD W 41/3 23 32 71.87 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 19/40 31 56 55.35 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 42/22 32 52 61.53 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 32/40 27 52 51.92 4 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/22 28 44 63.63 2 VIVIANN FENDLE W 45/35 27 52 51.92 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/7 19 24 79.16 2 VIVIANN FENDLE W 40/10 20 26 76.92 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 230 374 61.49 2 VIVIANN FENDLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 41/7 25 34 73.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 45/32 24 46 52.17 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/19 38 56 67.85 4 BRENDA ARNOLD L 25/40 25 56 44.64 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/24 30 56 53.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 44/33 30 56 53.57 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 35/45 24 52 46.15 4 BRENDA ARNOLD W 40/21 33 60 55.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 10/40 10 26 38.46 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 239 442 54.07 3 CAROL ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BRENDA ARNOLD W 43/28 28 54 51.85 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 11/42 13 36 36.11 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 32/45 20 46 43.47 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/16 28 48 58.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 BRENDA ARNOLD W 40/26 29 54 53.70 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/32 30 52 57.69 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 33/44 27 56 48.21 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 42/39 28 58 48.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 45%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 203 404 50.24 4 BRENDA ARNOLD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 28/43 20 54 37.03 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 42/25 27 50 54.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 3/41 10 32 31.25 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 VIVIANN FENDLE W 40/25 27 56 48.21 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 26/40 24 54 44.44 5 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/14 17 42 40.47 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 22/42 21 44 47.72 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 21/40 27 60 45.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 48%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 173 392 44.13 5 IDA BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 7/41 14 34 41.17 4 BRENDA ARNOLD L 25/42 23 50 46.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 16/40 22 48 45.83 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 22/42 26 52 50.00 2 VIVIANN FENDLE L 24/40 26 56 46.42 4 BRENDA ARNOLD L 14/40 12 42 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 39/42 26 58 44.82 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 7/40 8 24 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 56%) TOTALS W 0 L 8 157 364 43.13 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DORIS WILTON BC 9757 9 1 412 241 500 48.20% 2 JUANITA LAYE BC 1774 8 2 390 227 476 47.68% 3 LORRAINE HUBICK BC 0881 5 5 325 182 472 38.55% 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER BC 3902 4 6 291 164 460 35.65% 5* JEANETTE FERRARA BC 4214 2 8 275 166 464 35.77% 6* PAT ROOKES BC 0914 2 8 241 146 456 32.01% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DORIS WILTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 42/14 19 34 55.88 6 PAT ROOKES W 42/25 20 48 41.66 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 40/28 29 58 50.00 2 JUANITA LAYE W 43/27 26 50 52.00 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 43/7 20 34 58.82 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/23 21 46 45.65 6 PAT ROOKES W 40/25 23 46 50.00 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 40/22 21 50 42.00 2 JUANITA LAYE L 39/42 34 72 47.22 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 42/31 28 62 45.16 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 241 500 48.20 2 JUANITA LAYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JEANETTE FERRARA L 30/42 22 48 45.83 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 40/16 25 48 52.08 6 PAT ROOKES W 40/23 20 44 45.45 1 DORIS WILTON L 27/43 21 50 42.00 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 41/32 24 56 42.85 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 42/17 21 36 58.33 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 44/18 20 42 47.61 6 PAT ROOKES W 44/20 19 42 45.23 1 DORIS WILTON W 42/39 35 72 48.61 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 40/15 20 38 52.63 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 227 476 47.68 3 LORRAINE HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/8 16 28 57.14 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 40/3 16 30 53.33 1 DORIS WILTON L 28/40 25 58 43.10 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 40/26 20 50 40.00 2 JUANITA LAYE L 32/41 22 56 39.28 6 PAT ROOKES W 40/20 24 58 41.37 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 40/33 14 58 24.13 1 DORIS WILTON L 22/40 17 50 34.00 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 27/42 17 46 36.95 2 JUANITA LAYE L 15/40 11 38 28.94 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 182 472 38.55 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DORIS WILTON L 14/42 10 34 29.41 2 JUANITA LAYE L 16/40 17 48 35.41 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 40/34 21 54 38.88 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 26/40 16 50 32.00 6 PAT ROOKES L 30/41 17 52 32.69 1 DORIS WILTON L 23/41 12 46 26.08 2 JUANITA LAYE L 18/44 10 42 23.80 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 40/29 19 46 41.30 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 42/27 22 46 47.82 6 PAT ROOKES W 42/17 20 42 47.61 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 164 460 35.65 5* JEANETTE FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JUANITA LAYE W 42/30 26 48 54.16 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 3/40 4 30 13.33 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 34/40 20 54 37.03 6 PAT ROOKES L 37/40 18 52 34.61 1 DORIS WILTON L 7/43 10 34 29.41 2 JUANITA LAYE L 17/42 13 36 36.11 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 33/40 14 58 24.13 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 29/40 17 46 36.95 6 PAT ROOKES W 42/22 19 44 43.18 1 DORIS WILTON L 31/42 25 62 40.32 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 166 464 35.77 6* PAT ROOKES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 8/41 5 28 17.85 1 DORIS WILTON L 25/42 17 48 35.41 2 JUANITA LAYE L 23/40 13 44 29.54 5 JEANETTE FERRARA W 40/37 17 52 32.69 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/30 21 52 40.38 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 20/40 18 58 31.03 1 DORIS WILTON L 25/40 19 46 41.30 2 JUANITA LAYE L 20/44 11 42 26.19 5 JEANETTE FERRARA L 22/42 12 44 27.27 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 17/42 13 42 30.95 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 146 456 32.01 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 JOY OSBURN BC 5005 7 3 328 176 422 41.70% 2* DEB TURNER BC 5006 6 4 313 162 466 34.76% 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF BC 0649 6 4 320 154 458 33.62% 4 VIOLET GALLANT BC 1023 5 5 264 142 454 31.27% 5 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 4 6 256 149 458 32.53% 6 SUSAN MACDONALD BC 4084 2 8 258 145 454 31.93% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 JOY OSBURN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 37/22 20 38 52.63 4 VIOLET GALLANT W 38/20 19 44 43.18 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 23/36 17 44 38.63 2 DEB TURNER L 32/38 17 56 30.35 5 SUE BERTRAND W 35/7 14 24 58.33 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/14 18 42 42.85 4 VIOLET GALLANT W 36/13 19 40 47.50 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 38/34 20 58 34.48 2 DEB TURNER W 35/9 20 34 58.82 5 SUE BERTRAND L 19/37 12 42 28.57 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 176 422 41.70 2* DEB TURNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SUE BERTRAND W 35/9 15 38 39.47 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/28 19 52 36.53 4 VIOLET GALLANT L 33/36 17 48 35.41 1 JOY OSBURN W 38/32 19 56 33.92 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 31/36 16 50 32.00 5 SUE BERTRAND L 23/36 17 66 25.75 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/17 14 34 41.17 4 VIOLET GALLANT W 37/9 14 42 33.33 1 JOY OSBURN L 9/35 12 34 35.29 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 37/30 19 46 41.30 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 162 466 34.76 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 VIOLET GALLANT W 35/18 14 38 36.84 5 SUE BERTRAND L 24/35 10 42 23.80 1 JOY OSBURN W 36/23 21 44 47.72 6 SUSAN MACDONALD L 18/35 14 42 33.33 2 DEB TURNER W 36/31 19 50 38.00 4 VIOLET GALLANT W 35/23 14 42 33.33 5 SUE BERTRAND W 36/23 13 48 27.08 1 JOY OSBURN L 34/38 17 58 29.31 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 36/30 16 48 33.33 2 DEB TURNER L 30/37 16 46 34.78 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 154 458 33.62 4 VIOLET GALLANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 18/35 8 38 21.05 1 JOY OSBURN L 20/38 14 44 31.81 2 DEB TURNER W 36/33 18 48 37.50 5 SUE BERTRAND W 40/30 21 58 36.20 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/29 16 58 27.58 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 23/35 9 42 21.42 1 JOY OSBURN L 13/36 11 40 27.50 2 DEB TURNER L 9/37 7 42 16.66 5 SUE BERTRAND W 35/16 19 42 45.23 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 35/16 19 42 45.23 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 142 454 31.27 5 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DEB TURNER L 9/35 8 38 21.05 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 35/24 13 42 30.95 6 SUSAN MACDONALD L 23/36 17 48 35.41 4 VIOLET GALLANT L 30/40 20 58 34.48 1 JOY OSBURN L 7/35 6 24 25.00 2 DEB TURNER W 36/23 25 66 37.87 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 23/36 11 48 22.91 6 SUSAN MACDONALD W 40/31 17 50 34.00 4 VIOLET GALLANT L 16/35 12 42 28.57 1 JOY OSBURN W 37/19 20 42 47.61 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 149 458 32.53 6 SUSAN MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JOY OSBURN L 22/37 15 38 39.47 2 DEB TURNER L 28/35 19 52 36.53 5 SUE BERTRAND W 36/23 21 48 43.75 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 35/18 17 42 40.47 4 VIOLET GALLANT L 29/35 11 58 18.96 1 JOY OSBURN L 14/35 12 42 28.57 2 DEB TURNER L 17/35 10 34 29.41 5 SUE BERTRAND L 31/40 14 50 28.00 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 30/36 14 48 29.16 4 VIOLET GALLANT L 16/35 12 42 28.57 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 145 454 31.93 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS D (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DEBBIE VINCENT BC 4170 7 1 282 119 386 30.82% 2 MARGARET ONYSCHTSCHUK BC 1251 5 3 239 116 378 30.68% 3 HELENE BOUDREAU BC 2125 4 4 226 90 344 26.16% 4* JOYCE HAMEL BC 0505 2 6 189 97 344 28.19% 5* JANET LUM BC 5045 2 6 228 68 384 17.70% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DEBBIE VINCENT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JANET LUM W 37/21 15 60 25.00 3 HELENE BOUDREAU W 37/29 15 48 31.25 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 35/26 13 38 34.21 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK W 35/31 21 64 32.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 JANET LUM W 35/26 11 48 22.91 3 HELENE BOUDREAU W 36/7 12 32 37.50 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/6 16 40 40.00 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK L 31/37 16 56 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 26%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 119 386 30.82 2 MARGARET ONYSCHTSCHUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/11 13 42 30.95 5 JANET LUM W 35/29 13 44 29.54 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 31/35 21 64 32.81 3 HELENE BOUDREAU W 37/19 15 46 32.60 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/34 20 44 45.45 5 JANET LUM L 15/39 7 42 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT W 37/31 17 56 30.35 3 HELENE BOUDREAU L 12/39 10 40 25.00 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 116 378 30.68 3 HELENE BOUDREAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 29/37 11 48 22.91 5 JANET LUM W 38/27 15 40 37.50 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/22 16 38 42.10 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK L 19/37 8 46 17.39 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 7/36 3 32 9.37 5 JANET LUM W 38/28 9 54 16.66 4 JOYCE HAMEL L 20/35 11 46 23.91 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK W 39/12 17 40 42.50 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 4 L 4 90 344 26.16 4* JOYCE HAMEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK L 11/36 7 42 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 26/35 11 38 28.94 3 HELENE BOUDREAU L 22/36 11 38 28.94 5 JANET LUM W 36/23 13 50 26.00 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK L 34/36 21 44 47.72 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 6/36 8 40 20.00 3 HELENE BOUDREAU W 35/20 16 46 34.78 5 JANET LUM L 19/35 10 46 21.73 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 97 344 28.19 5* JANET LUM - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 21/37 4 60 6.66 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK L 29/35 9 44 20.45 3 HELENE BOUDREAU L 27/38 9 40 22.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 JOYCE HAMEL L 23/36 6 50 12.00 1 DEBBIE VINCENT L 26/35 10 48 20.83 2 MAR ONYSCHTSCHUK W 39/15 11 42 26.19 3 HELENE BOUDREAU L 28/38 6 54 11.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 JOYCE HAMEL W 35/19 13 46 28.26 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 68 384 17.70 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS E (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 10 0 315 89 306 29.08% 2* MURIEL SCALLON BC 1116 6 4 244 82 404 20.29% 3* SHARON LAGARDE BC 8018 6 4 237 71 388 18.29% 4** LINDA GREVELING BC 0990 3 7 182 57 402 14.17% 5** MARY DICKIE BC 0807 3 7 196 52 390 13.33% 6 CAROL PERRY BC 3407 2 8 185 71 422 16.82% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MARY DICKIE W 32/7 11 28 39.28 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 32/9 8 32 25.00 4 LINDA GREVELING W 31/2 8 28 28.57 3 SHARON LAGARDE W 33/4 11 18 61.11 6 CAROL PERRY W 32/15 12 32 37.50 5 MARY DICKIE W 30/10 8 36 22.22 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 32/10 10 34 29.41 4 LINDA GREVELING W 31/15 7 32 21.87 3 SHARON LAGARDE W 31/11 9 32 28.12 6 CAROL PERRY W 31/6 5 34 14.70 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 89 306 29.08 2* MURIEL SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SHARON LAGARDE W 30/28 14 56 25.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 9/32 3 32 9.37 6 CAROL PERRY L 19/32 6 50 12.00 4 LINDA GREVELING L 22/30 7 44 15.90 5 MARY DICKIE W 32/8 9 28 32.14 3 SHARON LAGARDE W 30/9 10 28 35.71 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 10/32 6 34 17.64 6 CAROL PERRY W 30/2 9 44 20.45 4 LINDA GREVELING W 30/14 7 46 15.21 5 MARY DICKIE W 32/24 11 42 26.19 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 82 404 20.29 3* SHARON LAGARDE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 28/30 11 56 19.64 6 CAROL PERRY W 30/27 8 54 14.81 5 MARY DICKIE W 31/14 9 30 30.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 4/33 1 18 5.55 4 LINDA GREVELING W 31/10 6 40 15.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 9/30 2 28 7.14 6 CAROL PERRY W 33/11 11 30 36.66 5 MARY DICKIE W 30/24 11 52 21.15 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 11/31 5 32 15.62 4 LINDA GREVELING W 30/26 7 48 14.58 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 71 388 18.29 4** LINDA GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 CAROL PERRY L 7/31 3 38 7.89 5 MARY DICKIE W 30/15 10 36 27.77 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 2/31 2 28 7.14 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 30/22 11 44 25.00 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 10/31 2 40 5.00 6 CAROL PERRY W 30/21 8 46 17.39 5 MARY DICKIE L 18/31 5 44 11.36 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 15/31 5 32 15.62 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 14/30 4 46 8.69 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 26/30 7 48 14.58 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 57 402 14.17 5** MARY DICKIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 7/32 2 28 7.14 4 LINDA GREVELING L 15/30 4 36 11.11 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 14/31 4 30 13.33 6 CAROL PERRY W 31/21 8 54 14.81 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 8/32 3 28 10.71 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 10/30 3 36 8.33 4 LINDA GREVELING W 31/18 7 44 15.90 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 24/30 7 52 13.46 6 CAROL PERRY W 32/19 8 40 20.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 24/32 6 42 14.28 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 52 390 13.33 6 CAROL PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LINDA GREVELING W 31/7 10 38 26.31 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 27/30 11 54 20.37 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 32/19 9 50 18.00 5 MARY DICKIE L 21/31 7 54 12.96 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 15/32 8 32 25.00 4 LINDA GREVELING L 21/30 6 46 13.04 3 SHARON LAGARDE L 11/33 6 30 20.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON L 2/30 3 44 6.81 5 MARY DICKIE L 19/32 9 40 22.50 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 6/31 2 34 5.88 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 71 422 16.82 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 WOMEN - CLASS F (25Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BENITA KARLSON BC 0484 7 1 190 59 260 22.69% 2* ANNETTE HUGHES BC 1807 4 4 171 55 274 20.07% 3* SANDRA HANSON BC 0874 4 4 148 47 266 17.66% 4 LAURA WILLIAMS BC 1767 3 5 152 33 300 11.00% 5 FAITH JUELL BC 1157 2 6 119 37 268 13.80% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BENITA KARLSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 FAITH JUELL W 26/11 11 30 36.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS W 26/18 9 28 32.14 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 27/24 9 40 22.50 3 SANDRA HANSON L 12/27 5 26 19.23 5 FAITH JUELL W 25/9 6 30 20.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS W 24/16 5 40 12.50 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 25/11 8 28 28.57 3 SANDRA HANSON W 25/14 6 38 15.78 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 59 260 22.69 2* ANNETTE HUGHES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS W 26/19 7 36 19.44 3 SANDRA HANSON L 20/25 8 38 21.05 1 BENITA KARLSON L 24/27 7 40 17.50 5 FAITH JUELL W 22/19 10 40 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS L 18/20 3 40 7.50 3 SANDRA HANSON W 25/7 8 26 30.76 1 BENITA KARLSON L 11/25 4 28 14.28 5 FAITH JUELL W 25/4 8 26 30.76 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 4 L 4 55 274 20.07 3* SANDRA HANSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LAURA WILLIAMS L 10/21 3 40 7.50 5 FAITH JUELL W 25/11 8 30 26.66 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 25/20 9 38 23.68 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 BENITA KARLSON W 27/12 9 26 34.61 4 LAURA WILLIAMS L 15/25 3 36 8.33 5 FAITH JUELL W 25/20 10 32 31.25 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 7/25 3 26 11.53 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 BENITA KARLSON L 14/25 2 38 5.26 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 4 L 4 47 266 17.66 4 LAURA WILLIAMS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SANDRA HANSON W 21/10 3 40 7.50 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 19/26 5 36 13.88 1 BENITA KARLSON L 18/26 4 28 14.28 5 FAITH JUELL L 17/21 5 40 12.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 SANDRA HANSON W 25/15 5 36 13.88 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 20/18 4 40 10.00 1 BENITA KARLSON L 16/24 3 40 7.50 5 FAITH JUELL L 16/24 4 40 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 9%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 33 300 11.00 5 FAITH JUELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BENITA KARLSON L 11/26 4 30 13.33 3 SANDRA HANSON L 11/25 5 30 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS W 21/17 4 40 10.00 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 19/22 8 40 20.00 1 BENITA KARLSON L 9/25 3 30 10.00 3 SANDRA HANSON L 20/25 5 32 15.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LAURA WILLIAMS W 24/16 6 40 15.00 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 4/25 2 26 7.69 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 37 268 13.80 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM BALAZS BC 4169 8 1 373 181 398 45.47% 2 AL GUSHTA BC 1504 7 2 328 172 400 43.00% 3* ROY DAWE BC 2807 6 3 335 192 450 42.66% 4* ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 6 3 301 179 440 40.68% 5 BOB TASCHNER BC 2914 5 4 294 166 460 36.08% 6 GORDON BUTTS BC 4202 4 5 291 158 402 39.30% 7** TOM MOFFAT BC 4016 3 6 225 133 382 34.81% 8** RON DENMAN BC 0599 3 6 263 144 432 33.33% 9** TONY RONDOW BC 0600 3 6 225 127 394 32.23% 10 WILF BLANCHARD BC 0557 0 9 206 117 402 29.10% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM BALAZS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 AL GUSHTA W 43/27 19 44 43.18 6 GORDON BUTTS W 44/7 20 30 66.66 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 43/10 23 42 54.76 5 BOB TASCHNER W 40/11 21 42 50.00 7 TOM MOFFAT W 40/10 22 34 64.70 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/33 16 50 32.00 3 ROY DAWE L 39/40 20 56 35.71 8 RON DENMAN W 40/16 16 42 38.09 9 TONY RONDOW W 43/26 24 58 41.37 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 181 398 45.47 2 AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM BALAZS L 27/43 14 44 31.81 8 RON DENMAN W 45/21 25 44 56.81 3 ROY DAWE L 4/43 5 24 20.83 6 GORDON BUTTS W 42/30 20 48 41.66 9 TONY RONDOW W 42/15 21 44 47.72 5 BOB TASCHNER W 42/29 27 56 48.21 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 41/35 21 54 38.88 7 TOM MOFFAT W 40/8 19 34 55.88 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 45/32 20 52 38.46 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 172 400 43.00 3* ROY DAWE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 GORDON BUTTS W 41/35 26 56 46.42 7 TOM MOFFAT W 40/26 27 60 45.00 2 AL GUSHTA W 43/4 17 24 70.83 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/14 22 52 42.30 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 34/40 27 56 48.21 8 RON DENMAN L 26/42 17 62 27.41 1 TOM BALAZS W 40/39 20 56 35.71 9 TONY RONDOW W 43/13 19 36 52.77 5 BOB TASCHNER L 27/41 17 48 35.41 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 192 450 42.66 4* ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 40/35 22 52 42.30 5 BOB TASCHNER W 43/29 26 56 46.42 1 TOM BALAZS L 10/43 13 42 30.95 8 RON DENMAN W 40/36 24 64 37.50 3 ROY DAWE W 40/34 31 56 55.35 9 TONY RONDOW L 11/42 9 40 22.50 2 AL GUSHTA L 35/41 18 54 33.33 6 GORDON BUTTS W 40/24 20 44 45.45 7 TOM MOFFAT W 42/15 16 32 50.00 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 179 440 40.68 5 BOB TASCHNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 TOM MOFFAT W 40/26 13 62 20.96 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 29/43 20 56 35.71 8 RON DENMAN W 42/20 21 48 43.75 1 TOM BALAZS L 11/40 12 42 28.57 6 GORDON BUTTS W 41/25 27 56 48.21 2 AL GUSHTA L 29/42 23 56 41.07 9 TONY RONDOW L 19/40 13 50 26.00 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 42/22 14 42 33.33 3 ROY DAWE W 41/27 23 48 47.91 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 166 460 36.08 6 GORDON BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ROY DAWE L 35/41 24 56 42.85 1 TOM BALAZS L 7/44 8 30 26.66 9 TONY RONDOW W 42/7 17 40 42.50 2 AL GUSHTA L 30/42 17 48 35.41 5 BOB TASCHNER L 25/41 22 56 39.28 7 TOM MOFFAT W 45/19 20 38 52.63 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/36 20 52 38.46 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 24/40 12 44 27.27 8 RON DENMAN W 42/11 18 38 47.36 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 158 402 39.30 7** TOM MOFFAT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BOB TASCHNER L 26/40 13 62 20.96 3 ROY DAWE L 26/40 24 60 40.00 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 40/5 19 30 63.33 9 TONY RONDOW W 40/13 19 40 47.50 1 TOM BALAZS L 10/40 13 34 38.23 6 GORDON BUTTS L 19/45 11 38 28.94 8 RON DENMAN W 41/35 18 52 34.61 2 AL GUSHTA L 8/40 9 34 26.47 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 15/42 7 32 21.87 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 133 382 34.81 8** RON DENMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 TONY RONDOW W 40/29 21 48 43.75 2 AL GUSHTA L 21/45 17 44 38.63 5 BOB TASCHNER L 20/42 14 48 29.16 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 36/40 22 64 34.37 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 42/13 16 34 47.05 3 ROY DAWE W 42/26 20 62 32.25 7 TOM MOFFAT L 35/41 15 52 28.84 1 TOM BALAZS L 16/40 10 42 23.80 6 GORDON BUTTS L 11/42 9 38 23.68 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 144 432 33.33 9** TONY RONDOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 RON DENMAN L 29/40 17 48 35.41 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 40/16 18 38 47.36 6 GORDON BUTTS L 7/42 6 40 15.00 7 TOM MOFFAT L 13/40 10 40 25.00 2 AL GUSHTA L 15/42 12 44 27.27 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 42/11 17 40 42.50 5 BOB TASCHNER W 40/19 19 50 38.00 3 ROY DAWE L 13/43 10 36 27.77 1 TOM BALAZS L 26/43 18 58 31.03 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 127 394 32.23 10 WILF BLANCHARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 35/40 20 52 38.46 9 TONY RONDOW L 16/40 10 38 26.31 7 TOM MOFFAT L 5/40 7 30 23.33 3 ROY DAWE L 14/41 15 52 28.84 8 RON DENMAN L 13/42 7 34 20.58 1 TOM BALAZS L 33/41 15 50 30.00 6 GORDON BUTTS L 36/41 18 52 34.61 5 BOB TASCHNER L 22/42 8 42 19.04 2 AL GUSHTA L 32/45 17 52 32.69 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 117 402 29.10 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:22 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# LOU BUSCH BC 4857 9 2 432 209 568 36.79% 2 LES ANDERSON BC 4226 8 3 416 195 546 35.71% 3* PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK BC 0738 7 3 368 188 534 35.20% 4* ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 7 3 371 160 518 30.88% 5 LYLE CUTLER BC 1617 6 4 381 191 522 36.59% 6 DON MCSWAIN BC 1237 5 5 323 146 512 28.51% 7** ORLANDO PELLIZZARI BC 2108 4 6 310 149 472 31.56% 8** NICK CULIC BC 3486 4 6 315 148 512 28.90% 9** LORENZO FERRARA BC 4218 4 6 324 129 480 26.87% 10 JACK DABNEY BC 4992 2 8 257 133 478 27.82% 11 JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 0 10 218 113 470 24.04% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 DON MCSWAIN W 42/25 20 56 35.71 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 40/6 15 26 57.69 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 40/39 23 60 38.33 8 NICK CULIC W 42/29 21 58 36.20 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/10 19 38 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 LES ANDERSON W 40/31 17 40 42.50 5 LYLE CUTLER W 43/37 22 68 32.35 10 JACK DABNEY W 45/25 20 62 32.25 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 26/41 16 48 33.33 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 32/40 20 50 40.00 2 LES ANDERSON W 41/33 16 62 25.80 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 9 L 2 209 568 36.79 2 LES ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN W 42/22 19 46 41.30 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 41/37 20 64 31.25 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 42/13 14 32 43.75 8 NICK CULIC W 40/14 20 42 47.61 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/36 16 54 29.62 1 LOU BUSCH L 31/40 15 40 37.50 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 42/22 18 54 33.33 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 23/40 18 62 29.03 5 LYLE CUTLER W 42/22 24 52 46.15 10 JACK DABNEY W 40/13 18 38 47.36 1 LOU BUSCH L 33/41 13 62 20.96 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 195 546 35.71 3* PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 40/37 17 50 34.00 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 40/34 23 56 41.07 8 NICK CULIC W 42/39 24 66 36.36 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/22 17 44 38.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN L 31/40 15 48 31.25 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 30/40 13 54 24.07 2 LES ANDERSON L 22/42 13 54 24.07 5 LYLE CUTLER W 40/38 23 62 37.09 10 JACK DABNEY W 43/28 23 50 46.00 1 LOU BUSCH W 40/32 20 50 40.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 188 534 35.20 4* ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 LORENZO FERRARA L 36/42 15 56 26.78 8 NICK CULIC W 44/19 19 58 32.75 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/21 16 38 42.10 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN L 19/40 9 46 19.56 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 42/28 15 52 28.84 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 40/30 17 54 31.48 10 JACK DABNEY W 40/23 16 52 30.76 2 LES ANDERSON W 40/23 21 62 33.87 1 LOU BUSCH W 41/26 20 48 41.66 5 LYLE CUTLER L 27/42 12 52 23.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 160 518 30.88 5 LYLE CUTLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 NICK CULIC W 41/30 13 52 25.00 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/15 16 38 42.10 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN W 41/26 21 56 37.50 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 38/43 23 56 41.07 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 40/23 16 34 47.05 10 JACK DABNEY W 41/21 23 52 44.23 1 LOU BUSCH L 37/43 21 68 30.88 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 38/40 23 62 37.09 2 LES ANDERSON L 22/42 17 52 32.69 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/27 18 52 34.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 191 522 36.59 6 DON MCSWAIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LOU BUSCH L 25/42 15 56 26.78 2 LES ANDERSON L 22/42 13 46 28.26 10 JACK DABNEY L 31/44 12 46 26.08 5 LYLE CUTLER L 26/41 17 56 30.35 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/19 12 46 26.08 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 40/31 18 48 37.50 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/29 19 60 31.66 8 NICK CULIC W 40/22 16 56 28.57 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 40/18 16 50 32.00 9 LORENZO FERRARA L 18/44 8 48 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 146 512 28.51 7** ORLANDO PELLIZZARI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 37/40 18 50 36.00 1 LOU BUSCH L 6/40 5 26 19.23 2 LES ANDERSON L 37/41 22 64 34.37 10 JACK DABNEY W 40/17 16 38 42.10 5 LYLE CUTLER W 43/38 24 56 42.85 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 28/42 11 52 21.15 8 NICK CULIC L 18/40 10 42 23.80 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN L 18/40 13 50 26.00 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/6 15 42 35.71 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 42/32 15 52 28.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 31%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 149 472 31.56 8** NICK CULIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LYLE CUTLER L 30/41 12 52 23.07 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 19/44 11 58 18.96 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 39/42 25 66 37.87 1 LOU BUSCH L 29/42 18 58 31.03 2 LES ANDERSON L 14/40 11 42 26.19 10 JACK DABNEY W 40/11 12 42 28.57 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 40/18 14 42 33.33 6 DON MCSWAIN L 22/40 13 56 23.21 9 LORENZO FERRARA W 41/17 15 38 39.47 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/32 17 58 29.31 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 148 512 28.90 9** LORENZO FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/36 13 56 23.21 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 34/40 22 56 39.28 1 LOU BUSCH L 39/40 20 60 33.33 2 LES ANDERSON L 13/42 3 32 9.37 10 JACK DABNEY W 40/33 13 52 25.00 5 LYLE CUTLER L 23/40 10 34 29.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/20 14 52 26.92 8 NICK CULIC L 17/41 7 38 18.42 6 DON MCSWAIN W 44/18 15 48 31.25 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 32/42 12 52 23.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 31%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 129 480 26.87 10 JACK DABNEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 11 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/27 16 46 34.78 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 DON MCSWAIN W 44/31 17 46 36.95 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 17/40 9 38 23.68 9 LORENZO FERRARA L 33/40 15 52 28.84 8 NICK CULIC L 11/40 5 42 11.90 5 LYLE CUTLER L 21/41 17 52 32.69 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 23/40 12 52 23.07 1 LOU BUSCH L 25/45 14 62 22.58 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 28/43 18 50 36.00 2 LES ANDERSON L 13/40 10 38 26.31 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 133 478 27.82 11 JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 JACK DABNEY L 27/42 12 46 26.08 5 LYLE CUTLER L 15/41 9 38 23.68 4 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 21/42 9 38 23.68 3 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 22/40 11 44 25.00 1 LOU BUSCH L 10/41 11 38 28.94 2 LES ANDERSON L 36/40 16 54 29.62 6 DON MCSWAIN L 29/41 17 60 28.33 9 LORENZO FERRARA L 20/40 9 52 17.30 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 6/41 5 42 11.90 8 NICK CULIC L 32/41 14 58 24.13 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 113 470 24.04 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:23 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ESKO KARLSON BC 2909 8 1 303 129 516 25.00% 2 FRED ORMISTON BC 3946 7 2 316 118 362 32.59% 3* TREVOR GREVELING BC 0991 6 3 271 103 464 22.19% 4* HERB BOSCHMAN BC 2921 6 3 285 95 438 21.68% 5 GLEN ROBINSON BC 0117 5 4 296 112 434 25.80% 6 DEREK GREVELING BC 0986 4 5 272 103 456 22.58% 7** CLAYTON WHITE BC 4194 3 6 222 78 414 18.84% 8** BOB BARKER BC 1289 3 6 251 82 488 16.80% 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE BC 2929 2 7 159 61 408 14.95% 10 KEN HENDERSON BC 9784 1 8 195 71 448 15.84% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ESKO KARLSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 BOB BARKER W 36/30 14 64 21.87 5 GLEN ROBINSON W 36/33 17 62 27.41 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 40/25 16 50 32.00 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/12 9 46 19.56 6 DEREK GREVELING W 35/33 13 58 22.41 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 35/27 14 56 25.00 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 15/37 10 58 17.24 2 FRED ORMISTON W 35/32 21 56 37.50 10 KEN HENDERSON W 36/29 15 66 22.72 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 129 516 25.00 2 FRED ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 35/8 12 32 37.50 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 36/1 14 28 50.00 8 BOB BARKER W 36/11 12 32 37.50 5 GLEN ROBINSON W 35/29 13 52 25.00 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 35/2 12 26 46.15 6 DEREK GREVELING W 38/21 15 46 32.60 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/12 9 34 26.47 1 ESKO KARLSON L 32/35 19 56 33.92 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 34/35 12 56 21.42 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 118 362 32.59 3* TREVOR GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 FRED ORMISTON L 8/35 6 32 18.75 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 35/19 13 38 34.21 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/30 13 64 20.31 6 DEREK GREVELING W 35/32 12 60 20.00 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 37/21 13 56 23.21 1 ESKO KARLSON L 27/35 11 56 19.64 5 GLEN ROBINSON W 36/29 12 50 24.00 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 36/33 16 58 27.58 8 BOB BARKER L 22/35 7 50 14.00 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 103 464 22.19 4* HERB BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 CLAYTON WHITE L 28/36 9 54 16.66 8 BOB BARKER W 37/21 13 56 23.21 6 DEREK GREVELING W 35/20 12 48 25.00 10 KEN HENDERSON W 36/9 9 40 22.50 5 GLEN ROBINSON L 9/37 7 38 18.42 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/7 9 30 30.00 1 ESKO KARLSON W 37/15 13 58 22.41 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 33/36 12 58 20.68 2 FRED ORMISTON W 35/34 11 56 19.64 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 95 438 21.68 5 GLEN ROBINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 KEN HENDERSON L 23/35 10 56 17.85 1 ESKO KARLSON L 33/36 15 62 24.19 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 37/11 9 38 23.68 2 FRED ORMISTON L 29/35 11 52 21.15 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/9 17 38 44.73 8 BOB BARKER W 35/21 16 50 32.00 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 29/36 9 50 18.00 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 36/16 13 38 34.21 6 DEREK GREVELING W 37/18 12 50 24.00 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 112 434 25.80 6 DEREK GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 36/13 11 48 22.91 10 KEN HENDERSON W 40/1 13 28 46.42 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 20/35 9 48 18.75 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 32/35 13 60 21.66 1 ESKO KARLSON L 33/35 12 58 20.68 2 FRED ORMISTON L 21/38 9 46 19.56 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 35/22 12 48 25.00 8 BOB BARKER W 37/31 17 70 24.28 5 GLEN ROBINSON L 18/37 7 50 14.00 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 103 456 22.58 7** CLAYTON WHITE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 36/28 12 54 22.22 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 19/35 8 38 21.05 1 ESKO KARLSON L 25/40 8 50 16.00 8 BOB BARKER L 31/35 10 58 17.24 2 FRED ORMISTON L 2/35 2 26 7.69 10 KEN HENDERSON W 36/25 13 54 24.07 6 DEREK GREVELING L 22/35 8 48 16.66 5 GLEN ROBINSON L 16/36 7 38 18.42 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/22 10 48 20.83 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 78 414 18.84 8** BOB BARKER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ESKO KARLSON L 30/36 7 64 10.93 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 21/37 7 56 12.50 2 FRED ORMISTON L 11/36 3 32 9.37 7 CLAYTON WHITE W 35/31 9 58 15.51 10 KEN HENDERSON W 37/31 9 50 18.00 5 GLEN ROBINSON L 21/35 12 50 24.00 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 30/35 12 58 20.68 6 DEREK GREVELING L 31/37 14 70 20.00 3 TREVOR GREVELING W 35/22 9 50 18.00 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 82 488 16.80 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 DEREK GREVELING L 13/36 5 48 10.41 2 FRED ORMISTON L 1/36 3 28 10.71 5 GLEN ROBINSON L 11/37 4 38 10.52 1 ESKO KARLSON L 12/35 2 46 4.34 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 21/37 9 56 16.07 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 7/35 2 30 6.66 8 BOB BARKER W 35/30 16 58 27.58 10 KEN HENDERSON W 37/23 12 56 21.42 7 CLAYTON WHITE L 22/35 8 48 16.66 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 61 408 14.95 10 KEN HENDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 GLEN ROBINSON W 35/23 17 56 30.35 6 DEREK GREVELING L 1/40 2 28 7.14 3 TREVOR GREVELING L 30/35 12 64 18.75 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 9/36 3 40 7.50 8 BOB BARKER L 31/37 7 50 14.00 7 CLAYTON WHITE L 25/36 9 54 16.66 2 FRED ORMISTON L 12/35 3 34 8.82 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 23/37 5 56 8.92 1 ESKO KARLSON L 29/36 13 66 19.69 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 71 448 15.84 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 MEN - CLASS D (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:23 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHRIS MACDONALD BC 4086 6 3 253 86 408 21.07% 2 KEVIN SCALLON BC 1115 5 4 255 81 412 19.66% 3 DAN COFFIN BC 3287 4 5 197 43 410 10.48% 4 JIM GALLANT BC 0169 3 6 189 53 390 13.58% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHRIS MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DAN COFFIN L 29/30 10 52 19.23 4 JIM GALLANT W 31/19 9 48 18.75 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 30/23 12 42 28.57 3 DAN COFFIN W 30/16 9 34 26.47 4 JIM GALLANT W 31/9 12 42 28.57 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 18/30 9 44 20.45 3 DAN COFFIN W 30/11 9 52 17.30 4 JIM GALLANT W 30/24 7 44 15.90 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 24/31 9 50 18.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 86 408 21.07 2 KEVIN SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JIM GALLANT L 28/32 10 46 21.73 3 DAN COFFIN L 28/30 6 58 10.34 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 23/30 8 42 19.04 4 JIM GALLANT W 30/10 8 34 23.52 3 DAN COFFIN L 25/31 10 56 17.85 1 CHRIS MACDONALD W 30/18 13 44 29.54 4 JIM GALLANT W 30/23 8 50 16.00 3 DAN COFFIN W 30/14 7 32 21.87 1 CHRIS MACDONALD W 31/24 11 50 22.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 81 412 19.66 3 DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHRIS MACDONALD W 30/29 6 52 11.53 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 30/28 6 58 10.34 4 JIM GALLANT L 16/30 2 44 4.54 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 16/30 3 34 8.82 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 31/25 9 56 16.07 4 JIM GALLANT L 18/30 2 48 4.16 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 11/30 4 52 7.69 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 14/30 4 32 12.50 4 JIM GALLANT W 31/12 7 34 20.58 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 43 410 10.48 4 JIM GALLANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 32/28 9 46 19.56 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 19/31 3 48 6.25 3 DAN COFFIN W 30/16 6 44 13.63 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 10/30 3 34 8.82 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 9/31 8 42 19.04 3 DAN COFFIN W 30/18 8 48 16.66 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 23/30 7 50 14.00 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 24/30 6 44 13.63 3 DAN COFFIN L 12/31 3 34 8.82 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 53 390 13.58 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - WINFIELD - September 5, 2009 MEN - CLASS E (25Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 16:23 ON 09/06/09 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 JIM GRANT BC 1510 8 1 215 57 288 19.79% 2 FRANK HUBICK BC 0880 6 3 180 34 330 10.30% 3* BRIAN STANTON BC 0893 2 7 124 39 326 11.96% 4* RAY HAMEL BC 0506 2 7 95 16 304 5.26% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 JIM GRANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 RAY HAMEL W 25/0 7 20 35.00 2 FRANK HUBICK W 25/5 8 30 26.66 3 BRIAN STANTON W 27/13 7 34 20.58 4 RAY HAMEL W 17/13 5 40 12.50 2 FRANK HUBICK W 26/12 4 36 11.11 3 BRIAN STANTON W 26/4 10 24 41.66 4 RAY HAMEL W 25/5 7 24 29.16 2 FRANK HUBICK L 22/27 5 40 12.50 3 BRIAN STANTON W 22/13 4 40 10.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 57 288 19.79 2 FRANK HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BRIAN STANTON W 23/16 3 40 7.50 1 JIM GRANT L 5/25 2 30 6.66 4 RAY HAMEL W 25/12 4 38 10.52 3 BRIAN STANTON W 26/5 8 36 22.22 1 JIM GRANT L 12/26 2 36 5.55 4 RAY HAMEL W 18/16 1 40 2.50 3 BRIAN STANTON L 19/22 3 40 7.50 1 JIM GRANT W 27/22 6 40 15.00 4 RAY HAMEL W 25/2 5 30 16.66 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 34 330 10.30 3* BRIAN STANTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 FRANK HUBICK L 16/23 4 40 10.00 4 RAY HAMEL L 10/23 1 40 2.50 1 JIM GRANT L 13/27 3 34 8.82 2 FRANK HUBICK L 5/26 2 36 5.55 4 RAY HAMEL W 27/9 9 30 30.00 1 JIM GRANT L 4/26 5 24 20.83 2 FRANK HUBICK W 22/19 7 40 17.50 4 RAY HAMEL L 14/15 4 42 9.52 1 JIM GRANT L 13/22 4 40 10.00 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 39 326 11.96 4* RAY HAMEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JIM GRANT L 0/25 0 20 None 3 BRIAN STANTON W 23/10 3 40 7.50 2 FRANK HUBICK L 12/25 2 38 5.26 1 JIM GRANT L 13/17 3 40 7.50 3 BRIAN STANTON L 9/27 2 30 6.66 2 FRANK HUBICK L 16/18 3 40 7.50 1 JIM GRANT L 5/25 0 24 None 3 BRIAN STANTON W 15/14 3 42 7.14 2 FRANK HUBICK L 2/25 0 30 None (Was 9%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 16 304 5.26